Multi-Objective Optimization of Two-Stage Helical Gearboxes using Non-Dominated Sorting Generic Algorithm II (NSGA-II): Minimizing Mass and Volume while Maximizing Efficiency.
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Engineering Technology, Duy Tan University, Viet Nam
 
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Viet Nam
 
 
Submission date: 2026-06-02
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-07-13
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-07-14
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-10-05
 
 
Corresponding author
Duong Vu   

School of Engineering Technology, Duy Tan University, 3 Quang Trung, Hai Chau, 550000, Da Nang, Viet Nam
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study presents an NSGA-II-based multi-objective optimization framework for two-stage helical gearboxes. The novelty of this work is the simultaneous optimization in case of three conflicting objectives: minimizing gearbox mass, minimizing gearbox volume, and maximizing transmission efficiency. The study does not merely optimize for a fixed set of values but examines the variation of the Pareto solution set across a very wide range of gear ratios, from 5 to 35, taking into account the gearbox volume was calculated as V=L×H×B₁, and the total transmission ratio u_h. The optimization was implemented in MATLAB, and Pareto fronts were generated for different transmission ratios. Hypervolume, spacing, spread, and the number of Pareto solutions were used to ensure robust algorithm convergence and solution diversity. The results show unique mechanical trade-offs. While raising the total transmission ratio reduces overall gearbox bulk, it also increases necessary volume and decreases transmission efficiency. The suggested method efficiently discovers balanced Pareto-optimal solutions and provides a practical tool for designing compact and high-efficiency two-stage systems.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
[1] WANG H., WANG H.-P., 1994, Optimal Engineering Design of Spur Gear Sets, Mech. Mach. Theory, 29/7, 1071–1080.
 
2.
LEI Y., HOU L., FU Y., HU J., CHEN W., 2020, Research on Vibration and Noise Reduction of Electric Bus Gearbox Based on Multi-Objective Optimization, Applied Acoustics, 158, 107037.
 
3.
PATIL M., RAMKUMAR P., SHANKAR K., 2017, Multi-Objective Optimization of Spur Gearbox with Inclusion of Tribological Aspects, J. Frict. Wear, 38/5, 430–436.
 
4.
YOUNES E.B., CHANGENET C., BRUYERE J., RIGAUD E., PERRET-LIAUDET J., 2022, Multi-Objective Optimization of Gear Unit Design to Improve Efficiency and Transmission Error, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 167, 104499.
 
5.
CHONG T.-H., 2020, A Design Method of Gear Trains Using a Genetic Algorithm, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 1/1, 62–70.
 
6.
COELLO C.A., VAN VELDHUIZEN D.A.,. LAMONT G.B, 2007, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, 2nd ed. New York, Springer.
 
7.
KONAK A., COIT D.W., SMITH A.E., 2006, Multi-Objective Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms: a Tutorial, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91/9, 992–1007.
 
8.
DEB K., PRATAP A., AGARWAL S., MEYARIVAN T., 2002, A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6/2 ,182–197.
 
9.
MENDEZ M., ROSSIT D.A., GONZALEZ B., FRUTOS M., 2020, Proposal and Comparative Study of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimum Design of a Gear System, IEEE Access, 8, 3482–3497.
 
10.
PATIL M., RAMKUMAR P., KRISHNAPILAI S., 2017, Multi-Objective Optimization of Two Stage Spur Gearbox Using NSGA-II, SAE Technical Paper, 0148–7191.
 
11.
XIN W., ZHANG Y., FU Y., YANG W., ZHENG H., 2023, A Multi-Objective Optimization Design Approach of Large Mining Planetary Gear Reducer, Scientific Reports, 13/1, 18640.
 
12.
KUMAR A., RAMKUMAR P., SHANKAR K., 2024, Multi-Objective 3-Stage Wind Turbine Gearbox (WTG) with Tribological Constraint, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 52/8, 5263–5289.
 
13.
HU M., ZHU J., GONG L., LU Z., LIU H., 2025, Multi-Objective Optimization of an Aeroengine Accessory Gearbox Transmission Based on a Heuristic Algorithm, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 38/2 ,04024126.
 
14.
[14] QI L., ZHOU J., XU H., 2022, Multi-Objective Optimization of Gearbox Based on Panel Acoustic Participation and Response Surface Methodology, Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 41/3, 1108–1130.
 
15.
SANGHVI R., VASHI A., PATOLIA H., JIVANI R., 2014, Multi Objective Optimization of Two Stage Helical Gear Train Using NSGA II, Journal of optimization, 2014/1, 670297.
 
16.
LE X.-H., VU N.-P., 2023, Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis, Appl. Sci., 13/13, 7601.
 
17.
DINH V.-T., et al., 2024, Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method, Processes, 12/6, 1160.
 
18.
DINH V.-T., et al., 2024, Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using MARCOS Method, Designs, 8/3, 53.
 
19.
VU D.-B., TRAN H.-D., DINH V.-T., VU D., VU N.-P., NGUYEN V.-T, 2024, Solving a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second-Stage Double Gear Sets Using the MAIRCA Method, Applied Sciences, 14/12, 5274.
 
20.
DINH V.-T., TRAN H.-D., VU D.-B., VU D., VU N.-P., LUU T.A., 2024, Using TOPSIS Method for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with First Stage Double Gear-Sets, Journal of Machine Engineering, 24/4, 41–56.
 
21.
HUNG T.Q., HUONG T.T.T., 2023, Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox to Improve Efficiency and Reduce Height, Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, B12, 236–247.
 
22.
VAN THANH D., DANH B.T., VAN CHIEN THANG N., DANH T.H., VAN TRANG N., TU H.X., 2023, Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear Sets to Reduce Gearbox Length and Increase Gearbox Efficiency, in International Conference on Engineering Research and Applications, Springer, 229–244.
 
23.
HUNG T.Q., BINH V.D., VAN THANH D., TUNG L.A., TUAN N.K., 2025, Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Two Gear Sets in First Stage to Reduce Volume and Enhance Efficiency Using the EAMR Technique, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15/1, 9288–19294.
 
24.
BINH V.D., VAN THANH D., NGUYEN K.M., HUNG L.X., 2024, Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Double Gears in the First Stage Using MARCOS, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14/6, 18245–18251.
 
25.
CHAT T., VAN UYEN L., 2007, Design and Calculation of Mechanical Transmissions Systems, Educational Republishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam 1.
 
26.
JELASKA D.T., 2012, Gears and Gear Drives, John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top