Planning-Based Decision Space Exploration for Digital Twins in Immature Production Processes
 
More details
Hide details
1
wbk - Institue of Production Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2026-04-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-05-22
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-05-26
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-06-07
 
 
Corresponding author
Alexander Bott   

wbk - Institue of Production Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstraße 12 Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Highly variant and immature production processes frequently occur during the ramp-up of new manufacturing technologies, where process parameters, resource configurations, and operating strategies must be established under incomplete process knowledge. The resulting combinatorial configuration spaces make systematic planning and evaluation of alternative process setups difficult. This paper proposes a planning-based digital twin architecture that enables structured exploration and reduction of such decision spaces while integrating simulation-based feasibility assessment. The approach combines formal modeling of discrete process parameter variants with automated planning and physics-based simulation using PyBullet. Symbolic planning operates on an abstract representation of process steps, resources, and parameter variants to generate consistent process paths under cost and quality objectives. These process paths are subsequently instantiated as executable simulation scenarios, allowing verification of their physical feasibility and operational behavior. The architecture integrates decision generation, execution, and evaluation within a unified and modular pipeline. A virtual thermoforming demonstrator is used to verify the functional feasibility of the approach and to illustrate systematic decision space reduction through constraint-based planning. The results demonstrate that planning-based digital twin architectures provide a scalable foundation for supporting decision-making during ramp-up and configuration of highly variant production processes.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Cluster Elektromobilität Süd-West. Die Produktionskette “Batteriesystem” und kritische Ressourcen. https://www.emobil-sw.de/filea... oduktionskette_Batteriesystem_und_kritische_Ressourcen.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2026.
 
2.
EYDLIN A., 2022, EU-Kommission Billigt Staatshilfen Für Zweites Batteriegroßprojekt. https://www.zeit.de/mobilitaet....
 
3.
WESTKÄMPER E., LÖFFLER C., 2016, Strategien Der Produktion: Technologien, Konzepte Und Wege In Die Praxis. Springerlink Bücher, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg, 309.
 
4.
Storz, T., Schild, L., Vogt, M., Hofmann, J., Fleischer, J., & Lanza, G. (2021). Entwicklung eines flexiblen Produktionssystems für Batteriezellen. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 116(4), 247-253.
 
5.
KERN W., HRSG. 1996, Handwörterbuch Der Produktionswirtschaft. 2., Völlig Neu Gestaltete Aufl, Enzyklopädie der Betriebswirtschaftslehre 7, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, 2462.
 
6.
WATERMEYER K., 2016, Ablaufplanung Mit Alternativen Prozessplänen, 1, Aufl. 2016, Best-Masters, Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, 90 S.
 
7.
YUSUF Y.Y., SARHADI M., GUNASEKARAN A., 1999, Agile Manufacturing, International Journal of Production Economics, 62/12, 33–43.
 
8.
OVERBECK L., BRÜTZEL O., STRICKER N., LANZA G., 2020, Digitaler Zwilling Des Produktionssystems, Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 115, 62.
 
9.
FULLER A., FAN Z., DAY C., BARLOW C., 2020, Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research, IEEE Access 8. Conference Name: IEEE Access, 108952–108971.
 
10.
GRIEVES M., 2014, Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence Through Virtual Factory Replication, Whitepaper.
 
11.
TAO F., ZHANG M., 2017, Digital Twin Shop-Floor: a New Shop-Floor Paradigm Towards Smart Manufacturing, IEEE Access 5, Conference Name: IEEE Access, 20418–20427.
 
12.
LENG J., WANG D., SHEN W., LI X., LIU Q., CHEN X., 2021, Digital Twins-Based Smart Manufacturing System Design in Industry 4.0: A Review, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 60, 119–137.
 
13.
MIHAI S., YAQOOB M., HUNG D.V., DAVIS W., TOWAKEL P., RAZA M., KARAMANOGLU M.,.
 
14.
BARN B., SHETVE D., PRASAD R.V., VENKATARAMAN H., TRESTIAN R., NGUYEN H.X., 2022, Digital Twins: a Survey on Enabling Technologies, Challenges, Trends and Future Prospects, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 24.4. Conference Name: IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, S. 2255–2291.
 
15.
ERAMO R., et al., 2022, Conceptualizing Digital Twins, IEEE Software 39/2, 39–46, https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.202....
 
16.
MOURTZIS D., DOUKAS M., BERNIDAK, D., 2014, Simulation in Manufacturing: Review and Challenges, Procedia CIRP 25, 213–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proc....
 
17.
NEGRI E., FUMAGALLI L., MACCHI M., 2017, A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-Based Production Systems, Procedia Manufacturing 11, 939–948, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prom....
 
18.
LIU C.K., NEGRUT D., 2021, The Role of Physics-Based Simulators in Robotics, Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems 4, 35–58, https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
 
19.
COUMANS E., BAI Y., 2016, Pybullet Quickstart Guide.
 
20.
KOENIG N., HOWARD A., 2004, Design and Use Paradigms for Gazebo, an Open-Source Multi-Robot Simulator, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Bd, 3, 2149–2154, 3.
 
21.
Baumgärtner, J., Hansjosten, M., Schönhofen, D., & Fleischer, I. J. (2023). Pybullet industrial: A process-aware robot simulation. Journal of Open Source Software, 8(85), 5174.PFROMMER J., SCHLEIPEN M., BEYERER J., 2013, PPRS: Production Skills and Their Relation to Product, Process, and Resource, 2013 IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA). 2013 IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), ISSN: 1946–0759, 1–4.
 
22.
GHALLAB M., NAU D., TRAVERSO P., 2004, Automated Planning: Theory and Practice, Amsterdam, Morgan Kaufmann, 635 S.
 
23.
GHALLAB M., HOWE A., KNOBLOCK C., MCDERMOTT D., RAM A., VELOSO M., WELD D., WILKINS D., BARRETT A., CHRISTIANSON D., FRIEDMAN M., KWOK C., GOLDEN K., PENBERTHY S., SMITH D.E., SUN Y., 1998, Pddl - the Planning Domain Definition Language.
 
24.
[24] PUROHIT L., CHOUHAN S.S., 2023, Web Service Composition Using an AI Planning Technique, Innovative Engineering with AI Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, S, 65–82.
 
25.
GRIEVES M., VICKERS J., 2016, Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behaviour in Complex Systems, Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches. Hrsg. von F.-J. Kahlen; S. Flumerfelt & A. Alves, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 85–113.
 
26.
TAO F., ZHANG H., LIU A., NEE A.Y.C., 2018, Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15.4. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2405–2415.
 
27.
KRITZINGER W., KARNER M., TRAAR G., HENJES J., SIHN W., 2018, Digital Twin in Manufacturing: a Categorical Literature Review and Classification, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 16th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2018 51.11, 1016–1022.
 
28.
JOPPICH T.D., 2019, Beitrag Zum Umformverhalten Von PA6/CF Gelegelaminaten Im Nichtisothermen Stempelumformprozess, Diss. Karlsruhe: Karlsruher Institut für Technologie.
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top