Semantic Interoperability in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Mapping Study on Integrating Knowledge Graphs with AAS and OPC UA
 
More details
Hide details
1
Production Systems and Factory Automation, Fraunhofer IWU, Germany
 
 
Submission date: 2026-02-07
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-03-12
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-03-20
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-04-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Jan Eric Huebner   

Production Systems and Factory Automation, Fraunhofer IWU, Germany
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Industry 4.0 and the rise of collaborative value chains necessitate seamless data integration across organizational and technological boundaries. Yet the fragmented standardization environment prevents interoperability across systems and within frameworks like the Digital Twin (DT). While the Asset Administration Shell (AAS) and Open Platform Communications (OPC) Unified Architecture (UA) are established as core standards for digital asset representation and communication, their independent origins and differing metamodels create semantic gaps that hinder unified machine-level understanding. This systematic mapping study examines how Knowledge Graphs (KG) can bridge semantic gaps to create unified semantic models. Current research demonstrates progress in pairwise integrations, such as transforming OPC UA models into RDF graphs or synchronizing AAS repositories with graph databases. However, these efforts often remain isolated solutions that address specific integration challenges. Consequently, large-scale industrial deployment remains limited. This paper consolidates current knowledge on integrating AAS, OPC UA and KGs, contextualizing these efforts and highlights research gaps toward achieving interoperable manufacturing ecosystems.
REFERENCES (60)
1.
JAZDI N., 2014, Cyber Physical Systems in the Context of Industry 4.0, IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, IEEE, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 1–4, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/doc....
 
2.
FULLER A., FAN Z., et al., 2020, Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research, IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971.
 
3.
TAO F., ZHANG H., et al., 2019, Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15/4, 2405–2415.
 
4.
GRIEVES M., 2014, Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence Through Virtual Factory Replication. LLC, White Paper, 1–7.
 
5.
PERNO M., HVAM L., et al., 2022, Implementation of Digital Twins in the Process Industry: a Systematic Literature Review of Enablers and Barriers, Computers in Industry, 134, 103558.
 
6.
SAHLAB N., KAMM S., et al., 2021, Knowledge Graphs as Enhancers of Intelligent Digital Twins, 2021 4th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), Victoria, BC, Canada, IEEE, Victoria, BC, Canada, 19–24, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/do....
 
7.
KARABULUT E., PILEGGI S.F., et al., 2024, Ontologies in Digital Twins: A Systematic Literature Review, Future Generation Computer Systems, 153, 442–456.
 
8.
ZHENG X., LU J., et al., 2022, The Emergence of Cognitive Digital Twin: Vision, Challenges and Opportunities, International Journal of Production Research, 60/24, 7610–7632.
 
9.
LADEGOURDIE M., KUA J., 2022, Performance Analysis of OPC UA for Industrial Interoperability Towards Industry 4.0, IoT, 3/4, 507–525.
 
10.
PLATTFORM INDUSTRIE 4.0, 2022, Details of the Asset Administration Shell – Part1: The Exchange of Information Between Partners in the Value Chain of Industry 4.0 (Version 3.0RC02), Berlin, https://www.plattformi40.de/IP....
 
11.
MELLUSO N., GRANGEL-GONZALEZ I., et al., 2022, Enhancing Industry 4.0 Standards Interoperability Via Knowledge Graphs with Natural Language Processing, Computers in Industry, 140, 103676.
 
12.
CZVETKO T., ABONYI J., 2023, Data Sharing in Industry 4.0 – Automation ML, B2MML and International Data Spaces-based solutions, Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 33, 100438.
 
13.
HOGAN A., BLOMQVIST E., et al., 2022, Knowledge Graphs, ACM Computing Surveys, 54/4, 1–37.
 
14.
GIBBINS N., SHADBOLT N., 2011, Resource Description Framework (RDF), BATES M.J. (ed.), Understanding Information Retrieval Systems, Auerbach Publications, 635–648, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/... 39891995/chapters/10.1201/b11499-53.
 
15.
HARRIS S., SEABORNE A., 2013, Sparql 1.1 Query Language, W3C, https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11....
 
16.
BOCK C., FOKOUE A., et al., 2012, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language, W3C, https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-ove....
 
17.
GUARINO N., OBERLE D., et al., 2009, What is an Ontology?, STAAB S., STUDER R. (eds.), Handbook on Ontologies, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1–17, http://link.springer.com/10.10....
 
18.
ARP R., SMITH B., et al., 2015, Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology, The MIT Press, https://direct.mit.edu/books/b....
 
19.
KULVATUNYOU B., DROBNJAKOVIC M., et al., 2022, The Industrial Ontologies Foundry (IOF) Core Ontology, Formal Ontologies Meet Industry (FOMI) 2022, Tarbes, FR, https://tsapps.nist.gov/ publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935068.
 
20.
BESTA M., GERSTENBERGER R., et al., 2024, Demystifying Graph Databases: Analysis and Taxonomy of Data Organization, System Designs, and Graph Queries, ACM Computing Surveys, 56/2, 1–40.
 
21.
KRITZINGER W., KARNER M., et al., 2018, Digital Twin in Manufacturing: A Categorical Literature Review and Classification, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51/11, 1016–1022.
 
22.
SARACEVIC F., 2017, Cognitive Digital Twin, Bosnia.
 
23.
ABBURU S., BERRE A.J., et al., 2020, COGNITWIN – Hybrid and Cognitive Digital Twins for the Process Industry, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Cardiff, UK, IEEE, Cardiff, UK, 1–8, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/do....
 
24.
JARKE M., OTTO B., et al., 2019, Data Sovereignty and Data Space Ecosystems, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61/5, 549–550.
 
25.
MÖLLER F., JUSSEN I., et al., 2024, Industrial Data Ecosystems and Data Spaces, Electronic Markets, 34/1, 41.
 
26.
DIN, 2016, DIN SPEC 91345:2016-04 – Reference Architecture Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI4.0), https://www.dinmedia.de/de/tec....
 
27.
BEDEN S., CAO Q., et al., 2021, Semantic Asset Administration Shells in Industry 4.0: A Survey, 4th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), Victoria, BC, Canada, IEEE, Victoria, BC, Canada, 31–38, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/do....
 
28.
WEISS A., IHLENFELDT S., 2022, Integration of OPC UA Information Models into Enterprise Knowledge Graphs, Journal of Machine Engineering, 22/2, 138–147.
 
29.
PETERSEN K., FELDT R., et al., 2008, Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Swindon, GBR, BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR, 68–77.
 
30.
SCHIEKOFER R., GRIMM S., et al., 2019, A Formal Mapping Between OPC UA and the Semantic Web, 2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Helsinki, Finland, IEEE, Helsinki, Finland, 33–40, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/do....
 
31.
BAKAKEU J., BROSSOG M., et al., 2019, Automated Reasoning and Knowledge Inference on OPC UA Information Models, 2019 Ieee International Conference On Industrial Cyber Physical Systems (ICPS 2019), 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA, IEEE, 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA, 53–60.
 
32.
SHENGBO W., GUO Y., 2023, Knowledge-Driven Analysis Framework of Anomaly Propagation in Manufacturing Workshop, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 58–62, https://www.scopus.com/inward/.... 85190674088&doi=10.1109%2FAEIS61544.2023.00017&partnerID=40&md5=4feab6bb278b7b282bda5be2698e84c8.
 
33.
GIL S., ZAPATA-MADRIGAL G.D., 2019, Semantic Automation Systems, a Suitable Approach for Automation Networks in The Industry 4.0, 2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (Ccac): Automatic Control As Key Support of Industrial Productivity, 345 E 47th St, New York, Ny 10017 Usa, Ieee, 345 E 47th St, New York, Ny 10017 USA.
 
34.
EL KALACH F., SOLANKI J., et al., 2024, A Federated Information System Framework for Vertical Integration, Manufacturing Letters, 41, 1192–1199.
 
35.
MEHLING C.W., WENZEL K., et al., 2021, Intelligent Production Systems Through Semantic Interoperability of All Assets – Linked Data for Selfoptimizing Manufacturing; Intelligente produktionssysteme durch semantische interoperabilität aller komponenten- linked data für die selbst -optimierende produktion, WT Werkstattstechnik, VDI Fachmedien GmBbH & Co., 111/4, 251–255.
 
36.
SONNENBERG G., STEIN P., et al., 2025, Queryable AAS Graphs for AI Agents: An Event-Driven Knowledge Graph Integration for AAS Environments, IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA, https://www.scopus.com/inward/... A65518.2025. 11205691&partnerID=40&md5=ff87a1fe2481c511e57225c31d5d7f15.
 
37.
FRIEDRICH C., VOGT S., et al., 2024, Enabling Federated Learning Services Using OPC UA, Linked Data and GAIA-X in Cognitive Production, Journal of Machine Engineering, 24/2, 18–33.
 
38.
BAREEDU Y.S., FRUEHWIRTH T., et al., 2024, Deriving Semantic Validation Rules from Industrial Standards: an OPC UA Study, SEMANTIC WEB, 15/2, 517–554.
 
39.
WAGNER M., 2025, Validating System Behavior in OPC UA Using Semantic Web Technologies, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V., 59, 155–160, https://www.scopus.com/inward/... 30456&doi=10.1016%2Fj.ifacol.2025.11.941&partnerID=40&md5=c869e7318bb412e1d74467bcd245bfbf.
 
40.
BADER S.R., MALESHKOVA M., 2019, The Semantic Asset Administration Shell, ACOSTA M., CUDRE-MAUROUX P., MALESHKOVA M., PELLEGRINI T., SACK H., SURE-VETTER Y. (eds.), Semantic Systems. The Power of AI and Knowledge Graphs, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 159–174, http://link.springer.com/10.10....
 
41.
BAKAKEU J., SCHAEFER F., et al., 2020, Reasoning Over OPC UA Information Models Using Graph Embedding and Reinforcement Learning, 2020 Third International Conference On Artificial In℡ Ligence For Industries (Ai4i 2020), 10662 Los Vaqueros Circle, Po Box 3014, Los Alamitos, Ca 90720-1264 Usa, Ieee Computer Soc, 10662 Los Vaqueros Circle, Po Box 3014, Los Alamitos, Ca 90720-1264 Usa, 40–47.
 
42.
BOZKURT A., SCHULZ R., 2023, Verwaltungsschale und Wissensgraphen-Basierte Planung der Produktionslogistik in Einem Fluiden Produktionssystem, Logistics Journal: Proceedings, /19, https://proc.logistics-journal....
 
43.
SAPEL P., GAROUFALI A., et al., 2025, Leveraging Ontologies and Asset Administration Shells for Decision-Support: a Case Study on Production Planning within the Injection Molding Domain, Internet of Things, 34, 101739.
 
44.
HUANG Y., DHOUIB S., et al., 2023, Semantic Interoperability of Digital Twins: Ontology-Based Capability Checking in AAS Modeling Framework, Ieee 6th International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems, Icps, 345 E 47th St, New York, Ny 10017 Usa, Ieee, 345 E 47th St, New York, Ny 10017 Usa.
 
45.
MUELLER A.W., GRANGEL-GONZALEZ I., et al., 2020, An Ontological View of the RAMI4.0 Asset Administration Shell, Proceedings of The 12th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering And Knowledge Management (Keod), Vol 2, Av D Manuell, 27a 2 Esq, Setubal, 2910-595, Portugal, Scitepress, Av D Manuell, 27a 2 Esq, Setubal, 2910-595, Portugal, 165–172.
 
46.
HUANG Y., DHOUIB S., et al., 2022, Enabling Semantic Interoperability of Asset Administration Shells Through an Ontology-Based Modeling Method, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 497–502, https://doi.org/10.1145/355035....
 
47.
POURJAFARIAN M., PLOCIENNIK C., et al., 2025, An ODP-Based Ontology for the Digital Product Passport, Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V., 135, 930–935, https://www.scopus.com/inward/... 590103&doi=10.1016%2Fj.procir.2024.12.125&partnerID=40&md5=0472abd4148f6a6d6b17a7ce76fb1cc6.
 
48.
VIEIRA DA SILVA L.M., KÖCHER A., et al., 2023, Toward A Mapping of Capability and Skill Models Using Asset Administration Shells and Ontologies, IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2023-September, https://www.scopus.com/inward/.... 2023.1027 5459&partnerID=40&md5 =4bb2850adf1b64ef44f5a04c28610831.
 
49.
YU R., ZHONG Y., et al., 2023, Leveraging Graph Databases for Automated OPC UA Information Model Construction, Proceedings of 2023 The 12th International Conference on Networks, Communication And Computing, Icncc 2023, 1601 Broadway, 10th Floor, New York, Ny, United States, Assoc Computing Machinery, 1601 Broadway, 10th Floor, New York, Ny, United States, 294–299.
 
50.
WANG S., XU O., 2023, Semantic Information Modeling and Implementation Method for Water Conservancy Equipment, IEEE Access, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 11, 133879–133890.
 
51.
WANG S., GUO Y., et al., 2025, A Deep Graph Neural Network-Based Link Prediction Model for Proactive Anomaly Detection in Discrete Manufacturing Workshop, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Elsevier B.V., 79, 301–317.
 
52.
SCHAPER S., LISTL F.G., et al., 2025, Automatic Behavior Simulation Model Generation for Virtual Commissioning of Machine Tools Through Engineering Data Integration, IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., https://www.scopus.com/inward/... 5741&partnerID= 40&md5=2960071dd0ad4d8efdc5a95969fc9987.
 
53.
GRANGEL-GONZALEZ I., HALILAJ L., et al., 2016, Towards a Semantic Administrative Shell for Industry 4.0 Components, 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Laguna Hills, CA, IEEE, Laguna Hills, CA, 230–237, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/doc....
 
54.
JIRKOVSKY V., OBITKO M., et al., 2018, Toward Plug&Play Cyber-Physical System Components, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14/6, 2803–2811.
 
55.
KATTI B., PLOCIENNIK C., et al., 2020, Bidirectional Transformation of MES Source Code and Ontologies, International Conference on Industry 4.0 And Smart Manufacturing (Ism 2019), Sara Burgerhartstraat 25, Po Box 211, 1000 Ae Amsterdam, Netherlands, Elsevier Science Bv, Sara Burgerhartstraat 25, Po Box 211, 1000 Ae Amsterdam, Netherlands, 197–204.
 
56.
PEREIRA P.H.M., CAINELLI G.P., et al., 2023, Interoperability Middleware for IIOT Gateways Based on Standard Ontologies and AAS, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V., 56, 9831–9836, https://www.scopus. com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85184960992&doi=10.1016%2Fj.ifacol.2023.10.403& par tnerID=40&md5=9 871038c092b4230b1fec96e6018a058.
 
57.
LI X., ZHANG S., et al., 2024, Knowledge Graph Based OPC UA Information Model Automatic Construction Method for Heterogeneous Devices Integration, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 88, 102736.
 
58.
HURTADO E., BURGOS A., et al., 2025, Self-Configurable Manufacturing Industrial Agents (SMIA): A Standardized Approach for Digitizing Manufacturing Assets, Journal of Industrial Information Integration, Elsevier B.V., 47, https://www.scopus.com/inward/... 15&partnerID=40&md5=cdde1b533e3d477b13571cfe9339885b.
 
59.
KOSSE S., HAGEDORN P., et al., 2025, Semantic Digital Twins in Construction: Developing a Modular System Reference Architecture Based on Information Containers, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 67.
 
60.
SHI D., MEYER O., et al., 2025, Dual Data Mapping with Fine-Tuned Large Language Models and Asset Administration Shells Toward Interoperable Knowledge Representation, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 91.
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top