Additive manufacturing of polyether ether ketone – PEEK parts with surface roughness modification by a laser beam
 
More details
Hide details
1
West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering And Mechatronics, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Szczecin, Poland
2
Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Mechanical Technology, Poznan, Poland
3
Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Dental Prosthetics, Szczecin, Poland
4
Department of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
Submission date: 2019-11-12
Acceptance date: 2020-02-20
Online publication date: 2020-09-25
Publication date: 2020-09-25
 
Journal of Machine Engineering 2020;20(3):117–124
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The physicochemical properties of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) allow to use this material for prosthetic restorations applied in implant prosthetics. So far, such attempts have been made in the technology of milling rough material solids of this polymer, but the surface quality was unsatisfactory. Therefore, the production of these materials by additive manufacturing techniques was proposed and an attempt was made to shape their surface using a laser. The possibilities of the method are determined in the paper and preliminary works related to the product surface shaping are presented. The process of making individual prosthetic restorations from the PEEK material by the additive method together with the technology of laser modification of the geometric structure of the material surface for applications in implant prosthetic treatment of patients is innovative and has not been used so far.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
KRECISZ B., CHOMICZEWSKA-SKORA D., PALCZYNSKI C., KIEC-SWIERCZYNSKA M., 2012, Allergic to metals and medical implants. Allergy, 4, G.
 
2.
DABROWSKA D., ROSZKIEWICZ J., SOSNOWSKI G., WOJCIK T., 2007, Allergy to metal implants used in orthopaedics, Post. Dermatol. Allergol., 24, 99–103.
 
3.
SPIEWAK R., MOED H., 2007, Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel: modified in vitro test protocols for better detection of allergen-specific response, Contact Dermatitis, 56, 63–69.
 
4.
SCHWITALLA A., MÜLLER W.D., 2013, PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature, J. Oral. Implantol., 13/6, 743–749.
 
5.
MISHRA S., CHOWDHARY R., 2019, PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review, Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res., 21/1, 208–222.
 
6.
NAJEEB S., BDS Z.K., BDS S.Z., BDS M.S,. 2013, Bioactivity and Osseointegration of PEEK Are Inferior to Those of Titanium: A Systematic Review, J. Oral. Implantol., 42/6, 512–516.
 
7.
KURTZ S.M., DEVINE J.N., 2007, PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants, Biomaterials, 28/32, 4845–4869.
 
8.
TOTH J.M, WANG M., ESTES B.T., SCIFERT J.L., SEIM H.B., TURNER A.S., 2006, Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications, Biomaterials, 27/3, 324–334.
 
9.
MENINGAUD J.P., SPAHN F., DONSIMONI J.M., 2012, After titanium, peek? Rev. Stomatol. Chir. Maxillofac., 113/5, 407–410.
 
10.
SIEMINSKI P., BUDZIK G., 2015, Additive techniques. 3D print, 3D printers, OWPW, Warsaw.
 
11.
GALETA T., RAOS P., SOMOLANJI M., 2012, Impact of structure and building orientation on strength of 3D printed models, KGK Kautschuk, Gummi, Kunststoffe, Croatia.
 
12.
PLATEK P., ZAHOR M., 2009, Application of the FDM method of rapid prototyping in the design process of the 5.56 mm modular small arms system (MSBS-5.56), Problems of Armament Techniques, WITU, 110/2, 95–102, (in Polish).
 
13.
Information materials of the Stratasys company, a manufacturer of prototyping machines in the FDM technique: staratasys.com, fortus.com, dimensionprinting.com.
 
14.
PEYRE P., 2015, Experimental and numerical analysis of the selective laser sintering (SLS) of PA12 and PEKK semi-crystalline polymers, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 225, 326–336.
 
15.
GUAN G., 2015, Evaluation of selective laser sintering processes by optical coherence tomography, Materials and Design, 88, 837–846.
 
16.
WANG C., WANG S., YANG Y., JIANG Z., DENG Y., SONG S., YANG W., CHEN Z.G., 2018, Bioinspired, biocompatible and peptide-decorated silk fibroin coatings for enhanced osteogenesis of bioinert implant, J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed., 29/13, 1595–1611.
 
17.
HAN X., YANG D., YANG C., SPINTZYK S., SCHEIDELER L., LI P., LI D., GEIS-GERSTORFER J., RUPP F., 2019, Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites Based on 3D-Printing Technology for Orthopedic and Dental Applications, J. Clin. Med., 8/2, 240, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm802....
 
18.
BUBIK S., PAYER M., ARNETZL G., KALTENEGGER H., LEITHNER A., KLAMPFL A., LOHBERGER B., 2017, Attachment and growth of human osteoblasts on different biomaterial surfaces, Int. J. Comput. Dent., 20/3, 229–243, Quintessence Pub. Co.
 
19.
PRZESTACKI D., BARTKOWSKA A., KUKLINSKI M., KIERUJ P., 2018, The Effects of Laser Surface Modification on the Microstructure of 1.4550 Stainless Steel, MATEC Web Conf., 237, D2ME, doi.org/10.1051/ matecconf/201823702009.
 
20.
KUKLINSKI M., BARTKOWSKA A., PRZESTACKI D., 2018, Investigation of laser heat treated Monel 400, MATEC Web Conf., 219, BalCon 2018, doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/2018....
 
21.
CHWALCZUK T., PRZESTACKI D., SZABLEWSKI P., FELUSIAK A., 2018, Microstructure characterization of Inconel 718 after laser assisted turning, MATEC Web Conf., 188, 02004, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecc... 201818802004.
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595