Analysis of Geometric Errors of Throat Sizes of Last Stage Blades in a Mid-Size Steam Turbine
1
Dept. of Power System Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
2
Experimental Research of Flow, Doosan Skoda Power, Czech Republic
Submission date: 2022-05-10
Acceptance date: 2022-06-18
Online publication date: 2022-06-28
Corresponding author
Petr Eret
Dept. of Power System Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitni 22, 306 14, Pilsen, Czech Republic
Dept. of Power System Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitni 22, 306 14, Pilsen, Czech Republic
Journal of Machine Engineering 2022;22(3):132-147
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Steam turbine technology with enhanced flexibility will continue to participate in electric power supply mixes. Last stage blades secure the reliability of a steam turbine and require high precision manufacturing and assembly. This case study presents a statistical analysis of geometric errors of the throat sizes of the last stage blades in a mid-size steam turbine. A 3D optical scanner is employed to capture detailed geometries of rotor blades and a half of assembled nozzle diaphragm. Unrolled cylinder cross-sections are used to evaluate 2D geometrical features such as blade throats and areas at three different diameters, and the results are compared to intended designs. In addition, linear correlations between the throat size and blade pitch, area and trailing edge thickness are established, and blade throat position shifts are quantified. Such a comprehensive study is presented for the first time, and some useful conclusions can be retrieved from this case study.
REFERENCES (37)
1.
KOBER T., SCHIFFER H.W., DENSING M., PANOS V., 2020, Global Energy Perspectives to 2060 – WEC’s World Energy Scenarios 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews, 31, 100523.
2.
GIELEN D., BOSHELL F., SAYGIN D., BAZILIAN M.D., WAGNE N., GORINI R., 2019, The Role of Renewable Energy in the Global Energy Transformation, Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38–50.
3.
FUNAHASHI N., 2017, 22 – Steam Turbine Roles and Necessary Technologies for Stabilization of the Electricity Grid in the Renewable Energy Era, Advances in Steam Turbines for Modern Power Plants, Tanuma T., Ed., Woodhead Publishing, 521–537.
4.
TOPEL M., LAUMERT B., 2018, Improving Concentrating Solar Power Plant Performance by Increasing Steam Turbine Flexibility at Start-Up, Solar Energy, 165, 10–18.
5.
MEGERLE B., MCBEAN I., STEPHEN RICE T., OTT P., 2014, Unsteady Aerodynamics of Low-Pressure Steam Turbines Operating Under Low Volume Flow, Journal of Turbomachinery, 136, 091008.
6.
HONG H., WANG W., LIU Y., 2019, High-Temperature Fatigue Behavior of a Steam Turbine Rotor Under Flexible Operating Conditions with Variable Loading Amplitudes, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 163, 105121.
7.
BEEVERS A., HAVAKECHIAN S., MEGERLE B., 2015, On the Prediction and Theory of the Temperature Increase of Low Pressure Last Stage Moving Blades During Low Volume Flow Conditions, and Limiting it Through Steam Extraction Method, Journal of Turbomachinery, 137, 101002.
8.
ZHAO Y., WANG C., LIU M., CHONG D., YAN J., 2018, Improving Operational Flexibility by Regulating Extraction Steam of High-Pressure Heaters on a 660 MW Supercritical Coal-Fired Power Plant: A Dynamic Simulation, Applied Energy, 212, 1295–1309.
9.
RICHTER M., OELJEKLAUS G., GORNER K., 2019, Improving the Load Flexibility of Coal-Fired Power Plants by the Integration of a Thermal Energy Storage, Applied Energy, 236, 607–621.
10.
STEVANOVIC V.D., PETROVIC M.M., MILIVOJEVIC S., ILIC M., 2020, Upgrade of the Thermal Power Plant Flexibility by the Steam Accumulator, Energy Conversion and Management, 223, 113271.
11.
NOWAK G., RUSIN A., LUKOWICZ H., TOMALA M., 2020, Improving the Power Unit Operation Flexibility by the Turbine Start-Up Optimization, Energy, 198, 117303.
12.
RUSIN A., NOWAK G., LUKOWICZ H., KOSMAN W., CHMIELNIAK T., KACZOROWSKI M., 2021, Selecting Optimal Conditions for the Turbine Warm and Hot Start-Up, Energy, 214, 118836.
13.
EMONTS D., SANDERS M.P., MONTAVON B., SCHMITT R.H., 2022, Model-Based, Experimental Thermoelastic Analysis of a Large Scale Turbine Housing, Journal of Machine Engineering, 22/1, 84–95.
14.
MCBEAN I., 2017, 16 – Manufacturing Technologies for Key Steam Turbine Parts, Advances in Steam Turbines for Modern Power Plants, Tanuma T., Ed., Woodhead Publishing, 381–393.
15.
ZHOU Y., CHEN Z.C., YANG X., 2015, An Accurate, Efficient Envelope Approach to Modeling the Geometric Deviation of the Machined Surface for a Specific Five-Axis CNC Machine Tool, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 95, 67–77.
16.
FU G., GONG H., FU J., GAO H., DENG X., 2019, Geometric Error Contribution Modeling and Sensitivity Evaluating for Each Axis of Five-Axis Machine Tools Based on POE Theory and Transforming Differential Changes Between Coordinate Frames, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 147, 103455.
17.
LI Q., WANG W., ZHANG J., SHEN R., LI H., JIANG Z., 2019, Measurement Method for Volumetric Error of Five-Axis Machine Tool Considering Measurement Point Distribution and Adaptive Identification Process, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 147, 103465.
18.
BAMMERT K., STOBBE H., 1970, Results of Experiments for Determining the Influence of Blade Profile Changes and Manufacturing Tolerances on the Efficiency, the Enthalpy Drop, and the Mass Flow of Multi-Stage Axial Turbines, ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Turbo Expo, Power for Land, Sea, and Air, V001T01A003, doi:10.1115/70-WA/GT-4.
19.
BAMMERT K., SANDSTEDE H., 1976, Influences of Manufacturing Tolerances and Surface Roughness of Blades on the Performance of Turbines, Journal of Engineering for Power, 98, 29–36.
20.
CHEN L., LI B., JIANG Z., 2017, Inspection of Assembly Error with Effect on Throat and Incidence for Turbine Blades, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 43, 366–374.
21.
GARZON V.E., DARMOFAL D.L., 2003, Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performance, Journal of Turbomachinery, 125, 692–703.
22.
DOW E.A., WANG Q., 2015, The Implications of Tolerance Optimization on Compressor Blade Design, Journal of Turbomachinery, 137, 101008.
23.
MONTOMOLI F., MASSINI M., SALVADORI S., 2011, Geometrical Uncertainty in Turbomachinery: Tip Gap and Fillet Radius, Computers & Fluids, 46, 362–368.
24.
LUO J., LIU F., 2018, Statistical Evaluation of Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variability by an Adjoint Method, Aerospace Science and Technology, 77, 471–484.
25.
WANG X., ZOU Z., 2019, Uncertainty Analysis of Impact of Geometric Variations on Turbine Blade Performance, Energy, 176, 67–80.
26.
XIA Z., LUO J., LIU F., 2019, Performance Impact of Flow and Geometric Variations for a Turbine Blade Using an Adaptive NIPC Method, Aerospace Science and Technology, 90, 127–139.
27.
ZHU Z.Q., ZHANG Y., CHEN Z.T., JIANG Z.P., 2020, A Methodology for Measuring and Evaluating Geometric Errors of Aero-Engine Blades Based on Genetic Algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 234, 260–269.
28.
SALEHI S., RAISEE M., CERVANTES M.J., NOURBAKHSH A., 2018, On the flow field and performance of a centrifugal pump under operational and geometrical uncertainties, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 61, 540–560.
29.
ZHANG W., ZOU Z., YE J., 2012, Leading-Edge Redesign of a Turbomachinery Blade and its Effect on Aerodynamic Performance, Applied Energy, 93, 655–667.
30.
WANG S., WEN F., ZHANG S., ZHANG S., ZHOU X., 2019, Influences of Trailing Boundary Layer Velocity Profiles on Wake Vortex Formation in a High-Subsonic-Turbine Cascade, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 233, 186–198.
31.
SIEVERDING C., MANNA M., 2020, A Review on Turbine Trailing Edge Flow, International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power, 5/2, 10.
32.
DING H., LI Y., LAKZIAN E., WEN C., WANG C., 2019, Entropy Generation and Exergy Destruction in Condensing Steam Flow Through Turbine Blade with Surface Roughness, Energy Conversion and Management 196, 1089–1104.
33.
GAO J., GINDY N., CHEN X., 2006, An Automated GD&T Inspection System Based on Non-Contact 3D Digitization, International Journal of Production Research, 44, 117–134.
34.
BAUER F., SCHRAPP M., SZIJARTO J., 2019, Accuracy Analysis of a Piece-to-Piece Reverse Engineering Workflow for a Turbine Foil Based on Multi-Modal Computed Tomography and Additive Manufacturing, Precision Engineering, 60, 63–75.
35.
SHIMAZAKI H., SHINOMOTO S., 2007, A Method for Selecting the Bin Size of a Time Histogram, Neural Computation, 19, 1503–1527.
36.
STANISA B., IVUSIC V., 1995, Erosion Behaviour and Mechanisms for Steam Turbine Rotor Blades, Wear 186–187, 395–400.
37.
AHMAD M., CASEY M., SÜRKEN N., 2009, Experimental Assessment of Droplet Impact Erosion Resistance of Steam Turbine Blade Materials, Wear 267, 1605–1618.
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Flutter Measurement of a Linear Turbine Blade Cascade with an Angular Position Deviation of One Blade
Petr Eret, Volodymyr Tsymbalyuk, Markus Eckert
Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Petr Eret, Volodymyr Tsymbalyuk, Markus Eckert
Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
| eISSN: | 2391-8071 |
| ISSN: | 1895-7595 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
