B-Splined Trajectory Modified Generation to Maximize Speed of the Nonholonomic AMR Robot
1
Department of Electrical Engineering and Mechatronics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Hungary
2
Technical Engineering College, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar 64001, Iraq
3
Department of Business Management, Al-imam University College, Balad, Iraq
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-07-06
Final revision date: 2024-11-16
Acceptance date: 2024-11-16
Online publication date: 2024-11-22
Publication date: 2024-11-22
Corresponding author
Husam A. Neamah
Department of Electrical Engineering and Mechatronics, Faculty of Engineering,, University of Debrecen, Òtemetö Utca 2-4, Debrecen, Hungary
Department of Electrical Engineering and Mechatronics, Faculty of Engineering,, University of Debrecen, Òtemetö Utca 2-4, Debrecen, Hungary
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Abstract: Trajectory path generation is critical for the Autonomous Mobile Robot (AMR) when moving frequently in the working environment in the shop floor to transport loads from one work station to another continuously. Traditionally, the AMR moves from one point to stop at the next point or turn which is inefficient and consumes much energy. This paper proposes the new concept of AMR trajectory path planning with curvature driven by maximizing speed control of the differential drive at each curve to move smoothly. B-splined is commonly applied to CAD and CAM machining effectively for tool path trajectory. Therefore, the B-splined curvature is studied and validated by simulation together with energy consumption. The simulation is on Matlab Simulink with numerical model. It is investigated that the B-splined trajectory is efficient in animating the AMR’s actual system. The velocity can obtain both linear and angular velocity of the AMR movements on forward and backward directions as well as the acceleration. The trajectory can be selected based on the degree of closeness and used to generate speed and velocity control for the AMR system.
REFERENCES (41)
1.
KATONA K., NEAMAH H.A., KORONDI P., 2024, Obstacle Avoidance and Path Planning Methods for Autonomous Navigation of Mobile Robot, Sensors, 24/11, https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113....
2.
KECZAN L., et al., 2024, Technical Limitations of Organic Human-Robot Interaction (O-HRI) for Mobile Robots Moving Amongst Humans, 2024 IEEE 21st International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC), IEEE, 1–6, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ab....
3.
NEAMAH H.A., MAYORGA O.A., 2024, Optimized TD3 Algorithm for Robust Autonomous Navigation in Crowded and Dynamic Human-Interaction Environments, Results Eng., 24, 102874, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.rineng.2024.102874.
4.
KOCH P.E., WANG K., 1988, Introduction of B-Splines to Trajectory Planning for Robot Manipulators, Model. Identif. Control Nor. Res. Bull., 9/2, 69–80, 1988, https://doi.org/10.4173/mic.19....
5.
RIBOLI M., CORRADINI F., SILVESTRI M., AIMI A., 2023, A New Framework for Joint Trajectory Planning Based on Time-Parameterized B-Splines, Comput.-Aided Des., 154, 103421, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad. 2022.103421.
6.
ALMUSAWI H., AL-JABALI M., KHALED A., KORONDI P., HUSI G., 2022, Self-Driving Robotic Car Utilizing Image Processing and Machine Learning, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1256, 012024, https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-899X/1256/1/012024.
7.
NEAMAH H.A., KHUDHAIR M.A., DHAIBAN M.S., 2024, Navigating Attention-Centric: a Machine Learning Approach to EMG-Based Hand Gesture Recognition for Interactive RC Car, 2024 IEEE 21st International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC), 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/PEMC61....
8.
KANO H., FUJIOKA H., 2018, B-Spline Trajectory Planning with Curvature Constraint, Annual American Control Conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI: IEEE, Jun., 1963–1968. https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2... 1703.
9.
BERGLUND T., BRODNIK A., JONSSON H., STAFFANSON M., SODERKVIST I., 2010, Planning Smooth and Obstacle-Avoiding B-Spline Paths for Autonomous Mining Vehicles, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 7/1, 167–172, https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2....
10.
CHANG S.R., HUH U.Y., 2015, Curvature-Continuous 3D Path-Planning Using QPMI Method, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 12/6, 76, https://doi.org/10.5772/60718.
11.
CHARLEBOIS M., GUPTA K., PAYANDEH S., 1999, Shape Description of Curved Surfaces from Contact Sensing Using Surface Normals, Int. J. Robot. Res., 18/8, 779–787, https://doi.org/10.1177/027836....
12.
BECERRA H.M., COLUNGA J.A., ROMERO J.G., 2018, Simultaneous Convergence of Position and Orientation of Wheeled Mobile Robots Using Trajectory Planning and Robust Controllers, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 15/1, 172988141875457, https://doi.org/10.1177/172988....
13.
IBRAHIM F., ABOUELSOUD A.A., FATH ELBAB A.M.R., OGATA T., 2019, Path Following Algorithm for Skid-Steering Mobile Robot Based on Adaptive Discontinuous Posture Control, Adv. Robot., 33/9, 439–453, https://doi.org/10.1080/016918....
14.
NETO W.A., PINTO M.F., MARCATO A.L.M., DA SILVA I.C., FERNANDES D.D.A., 2019, Mobile Robot Localization Based on the Novel Leader-Based Bat Algorithm, J. Control Autom. Electr. Syst., 30/3, 337–346, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313....
15.
NEAMAH H.A., AL ARDI D., KORONDI P., 2024, Enhancing Autonomous Robot Perception for Precision Positioning and Localization, 2024 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), IEEE, 1058–1063, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ab....
16.
OFTADEH R., AREF M.M., GHABCHELOO R., MATTILA J., 2013, Mechatronic Design of a four Wheel Steering Mobile Robot with Fault-Tolerant Odometry Feedback, IFAC Proc., 46/5, 663–669, https://doi.org/ 10.3182/20130410-3-CN-2034.00092.
17.
MUDENG V., et al., 2020, Design and Simulation of Two-Wheeled Balancing Mobile Robot with PID Controller, Int. J. Sustain. Transp. Technol., 3/1, 12–19, https://doi.org/10.31427/IJSTT....
18.
YEKINNI L.A., DAN-ISA A., 2019, Fuzzy Logic Control of Goal-Seeking 2-Wheel Differential Mobile Robot Using Unicycle Approach, IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), Selangor, Malaysia: IEEE, 300–304, https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACI....
19.
DENG M., INOUE A., SEKIGUCHI K., JIANG L., 2010, Two-Wheeled Mobile Robot Motion Control in Dynamic Environments, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 26/3, 268–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim....
20.
CHEN C.Y., LI T.H.S., YEH Y.C., CHANG C.C., 2008, Design and Implementation of an Adaptive Sliding-Mode Dynamic Controller for Wheeled Mobile Robots, Mechatronics, 19/2, 156–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mech... tronics.2008.09.004.
21.
MARTINS F.N., CELESTE W.C., CARELLI R., SARCINELLI-FILHO M., BASTOS-FILHO T.F., 2008, An Adaptive Dynamic Controller for Autonomous Mobile Robot Trajectory Tracking, Control Eng. Pract., 16/11, 1354–1363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cone....
22.
NEAMAH H.A., BUTDEE R., 2024, Optimization Modeling Parameters for Industrial AMR Slippage Using ANFIS System in Dynamic Environment, Advanced in Creative Technology- added Value Innovations in Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing.
23.
ANTONINI P., IPPOLITI G., LONGHI S., 2006, Learning Control of Mobile Robots Using a Multiprocessor System, Control Eng. Pract., 14/11, 1279–1295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cone....
24.
NEMEC D., ŠIMÁK V., JANOTA A., HRUBOŠ M., BUBENÍKOVÁ E., 2019, Precise Localization of the Mobile Wheeled Robot Using Sensor Fusion of Odometry, Visual Artificial Landmarks and Inertial Sensors, Robot. Auton. Syst., 112, 168–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robo....
25.
LINDGREN F., RUE H., LINDSTRÖM J., 2011, An Explicit Link Between Gaussian Fields and Gaussian Markov Random Fields: The Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Approach, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 73/4, 423–498, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
26.
SARKKA S., SOLIN A., HARTIKAINEN J., 2013, Spatiotemporal Learning Via Infinite-Dimensional Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing: A Look at Gaussian Process Regression Through Kalman Filtering, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 30/4, 51–61, https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.20....
27.
HARTIKAINEN J., SARKKA S., 2010, Kalman Filtering and Smoothing Solutions to Temporal Gaussian Process Regression Models, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, Kittila, Finland: IEEE, 379–384, https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2....
28.
CHONG T.J., TANG X.J., LENG C.H., YOGESWARAN M., NG O.E., CHONG Y.Z., 2015, Sensor Technologies and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), Procedia Comput. Sci., 76, 174–179, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.336.
29.
LENAC K., KITANOV A., CUPEC R., PETROVIĆ I., 2017, Fast Planar Surface 3D SLAM Using LIDAR, Robot. Auton. Syst., 92, 197–220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robo....
30.
CADENA C., et al., 2016, Past, Present, And Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age, IEEE Trans. Robot., 32/6, 1309–1332, https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.20....
31.
ANDERSON S., DELLAERT F., BARFOOT T.D., 2014, A Hierarchical Wavelet Decomposition for Continuous-Time SLAM, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China: IEEE, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2....
32.
HAN M.W., KOLEJKA T., 1994, Artificial Neural Networks for Control of Autonomous Mobile Robots, IFAC Proc., 27/4, 157–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-....
33.
CARELLI R., FORTE G., CANALI L., MUT V., ARAGUÁS G., DESTÉFANIS E., 2008, Autonomous and Teleoperation Control of a Mobile Robot, Mechatronics, 18/4, 187–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mech.... 2008.01.002.
34.
SÁNCHEZ-IBÁÑEZ J.R., PÉREZ-DEL-PULGAR C.J., GARCÍA-CEREZO A., 2021, Path Planning for Autonomous Mobile Robots: A Review, Sensors, 21/23, 7898, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21237....
35.
SHUM A., MORRIS K., KHAJEPOUR A., 2015, Direction-Dependent Optimal Path Planning for Autonomous Vehicles, Robot. Auton. Syst., 70, 202–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robo....
36.
TAKEI R., TSAI R., 2013, Optimal Trajectories of Curvature Constrained Motion in the Hamilton–Jacobi Formulation, J. Sci. Comput., 54/2–3, 622–644, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915....
37.
BOKANOWSKI O., FORCADEL N., ZIDANI H., 2010, Reachability and Minimal Times for State Constrained Nonlinear Problems Without Any Controllability Assumption, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48/7, 4292–4316, https:// doi.org/10.1137/090762075.
38.
LEE J., KIM D.W., 216, An Effective Initialization Method for Genetic Algorithm-Based Robot Path Planning Using a Directed Acyclic Graph, Inf. Sci., 332, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.....
39.
CHEN Y., LI L., PENG H., XIAO J., YANG Y., SHI Y., 2017, Particle Swarm Optimizer with Two Differential Mutation, Appl. Soft Comput., 61, 314–330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc....
40.
RAVANKAR A., RAVANKAR A., KOBAYASHI Y., HOSHINO Y., PENG C.C., 2018, Path Smoothing Techniques in Robot Navigation: State-of-the-Art, Current and Future Challenges, Sensors, 18/9, 3170, https:/ /doi.org/10.3390/s18093170.
41.
BAKSHI S., FENG T., YAN Z., MA Z., CHEN D., 2021, Energy-Conscientious Trajectory Planning for an Autonomous Mobile Robot in an Asymmetric Task Space, J. Intell. Robot. Syst., 101/1, 18, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10846-020-01288-9.
| eISSN: | 2391-8071 |
| ISSN: | 1895-7595 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
