Using TOPSIS Method for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with First Stage Double Gear-sets
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Rector board, East Asia University of Technology, Viet Nam
 
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Vinh Long University of Technology Education, Viet Nam
 
3
Rector Board, Viet Tri University of Industry, Viet Nam
 
4
School of Engineering and Technology, Duy Tan University, Viet Nam
 
5
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Viet Nam
 
 
Submission date: 2024-06-02
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-12-03
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-12-03
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-12-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Tung Anh Luu   

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Viet Nam
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In order to build a two-stage helical gearbox (THG) with first stage double gear-sets (FSDG), the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is introduced in this research as a new approach to solving the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP). The study's objective is to deter-mine the best primary design factors that simultaneously satisfy two goals: maximal gearbox ef-ficiency and minimal gearbox mass. To that end, the first stage's gear ratio and the first and sec-ond stages' CWFW were chosen as the three main design elements. Furthermore, two distinct goals were analyzed: the lowest gearbox mass and the highest gearbox efficiency. Additionally, the MOOP is carried out in two steps: phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to close the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal primary design factors. Furthermore, the TOPSIS approach was selected to address the MOOP problem. For the first time, an MCDM technique is used to solve the MOOP of a helical gearbox with FSDG. Additionally, this is the first investigation of the total gearbox efficiency, which includes the power losses during idle. When designing the gearbox, the optimal values for three crucial design parameters were ascertained using the study's results.
REFERENCES (13)
1.
MILER D., et al., 2018, Multi-Objective Spur Gear Pair Optimization Focused on Volume and Efficiency, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 185–195.
 
2.
PATIL M., RAMKUMAR P., SHANKAR K., 2019, Multi-Objective Optimization of the Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Tribological Constraints, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 38–57.
 
3.
YOUNES E.B., et al., 2022, Multi-Objective Optimization of Gear Unit Design to Improve Efficiency and Transmission Error, Mechanism and Machine Theory, p. 104499.
 
4.
KIM S.C., et al., 2020 Macro Geometry Optimization of a Helical Gear Pair For Mass, Efficiency, and Transmission Error, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 103634.
 
5.
MAPUTI E.S., ARORA R., 2020, Multi-Objective Optimization of a 2-Stage Spur Gearbox Using NSGA-II and Decision-Making Methods, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 1–22.
 
6.
ISTENES G., POLÁK J., 2024, Investigating the Effect of Gear Ratio in the Case of Joint Multi-Objective Optimization of Electric Motor and Gearbox, Energies, 1203.
 
7.
KUMAR A., RAMKUMAR P., SHANKAR K., 2023, Multi-Objective 3-Stage Wind Turbine Gearbox (WTG) with Tribological Constraint, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 1–27.
 
8.
PATIL M., RAMKUMAR P., SHANKAR K., 2017, Multi-Objective Optimization of Spur Gearbox with Inclusion of Tribological Aspects, Journal of Friction and Wear, 430–436.
 
9.
LE X.-H., VU N.-P., 2023, Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis, Applied Sciences, 7601.
 
10.
HUNG T. Q., HUONG T.T.T., 2023, Multi-objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox to Improve Efficiency and Reduce Height, Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 236–247.
 
11.
HUY T.Q., et al., 2023, Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear Sets to Reduce Gearbox Mass and Increase Gearbox Efficiency, WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, 287–298.
 
12.
RÖMHILD I., LINKE H., 1992, Gezielte Auslegung von Zahnradgetrieben mit minimaler Masse auf der Basis neuer Berechnungsverfahren, Konstruktion, 229–236.
 
13.
JELASKA D.T., 2012, Gears and Gear Drives, John Wiley & Sons.
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top