High-Speed on-Machine Metrology: the Impact of Operational Parameters and Workpiece Geometry on Contact Scanning Accuracy
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada
 
2
Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
 
3
-, Pratt and Whitney Canada, Canada
 
 
Submission date: 2026-01-28
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-04-20
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-04-21
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-04-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Katarzyna Matys-Popielska   

Department of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, H3T1J4, Montréal, Canada
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Contact coordinate measuring systems determine the dimensions and forms of complex geometries. In the context of Industry 4.0, measurement integration into the manufacturing process, such as a machine tool, is sought. On-machine measurement (OMM) may enhance productivity and reduce costs, but it also presents challenges, including the presence of coolant and contaminants, as well as dynamic errors that impact measurement. The influence of scanning speed and sense, as well as the size and type of the measured ring gauges, on measurement is experimentally investigated based on bidirectional scans of five reference ring gauges at three speeds between 2116 mm/min and 15240 mm/min. The actual measurement deviations from the nominal value were isolated by subtracting the first harmonic from the raw machine and probe readings. The peak-to-peak values and root mean square (RMS) values of probe readings were used to assess the results. The peak-to-peak and RMS values increase as the speed and diameter of the ring increase. In the case of high scanning speed, for example, the RMS value is 0.126 mm, and for low scanning speed, the RMS value is 0.062 mm. The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test shows a significant impact of scanning speed (p = 7.75e-9) and ring size (p = 9.31e-4) on the magnitude of error.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
NASRIL et al., 2024, On-Machine Measurement of Machining Accuracy Based on a Support Vector Regression (SVR) Model for Product Quality Monitoring, in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Smart Mechatronics (ICSMech), IEEE, 213–218, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMec....
 
2.
WIECZOROWSKI M., TROJANOWSKA J., 2023, Towards Metrology 4.0 in Dimensional Measurements, Journal of Machine Engineering, https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/1....
 
3.
ARCHENTI A., GAO W., DONMEZ A., SAVIO E., IRINO N., 2024, Integrated Metrology for Advanced Manufacturing, CIRP Annals, 73/2, 639–665, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp....
 
4.
YU J., LIN X., YANG Y., CAI J.-H., 2022, Design and Characteristic Research of Contact Probe for High-Precision 3D Thread-Measuring Machine, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 119/3–4, 2235–2245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170....
 
5.
SHEN Y., et al., 2024, Dynamic Error Modeling and Compensation of a Scanning Probe on CMM, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 73, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.20....
 
6.
ZHENG W., LIU Z., FU L., GUO J., 2021, Effective Improvement of Scanning Resonance Through Dynamic Optimization of the Probe, Measurement, 178, 109438, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
7.
ZHENG W., ZHANG G., LI H., YANG X., SHAO W., LIU Z., 2023, Dynamic Compensation Strategy for Scanning Error of Contact Probe Based on Damping Ratio and Frequency Mapping, IEEE Sensors Journal, 23/23, 28649–28659, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2....
 
8.
ZHENG W., ZHANG S., PENG H., TIAN C., ZENG H., SHAO W., 2026, High-Precision Dynamic Error Compensation for Scanning Probes Via a Hybrid Data-Driven Framework, Measurement, 261, 120015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
9.
JIANG W.S., CHENG Z.Y., GONG W.C., YU L., LI R.J., HUANG Q.X., 2021, A Novel Dynamic Compensation Method for a Contact Probe Based on Bayesian Inversion, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 186, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
10.
LV X., SHEN Y., ZHANG X., HUA Z., GUO W., TU D., 2026, Selection of Measurement Parameters Based on the Dynamic Characteristics of the Scanning Probe, Measurement, 266, 120501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
11.
LU C., WANG J., ALIMUJIANG A., LI S., HOU Z., 2022, Dynamics Model of Scanning Probe on GMC, Measurement, 199, 111472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
12.
SHEN Y., REN J., HUANG N., ZHANG Y., ZHANG X., ZHU L., 2023, Surface Form Inspection with Contact Coordinate Measurement: A Review, Int. J. Extrem. Manuf., 5/2, 022006, https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7....
 
13.
WOZNIAK A., KRAJEWSKI G., BYSZEWSKI M., 2019, A New Method for Examining the Dynamic Performance of Coordinate Measuring Machines, Measurement, 134, 814–819, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
14.
LYU D., LIU Q., LIU H., ZHAO W., 2020, Dynamic Error of CNC Machine Tools: A State-of-the-Art Review, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 106, 5–6, 1869–1891, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170....
 
15.
LIU Q., et al., 2025, Geometric and Dynamic Error Compensation of Dual-Drive Machine Tool Based on Mechanism-Data Hybrid Method, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 224, 112041, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
16.
JEDRZEJEWSKI J., KWASNY W., 2015, Development of Machine Tool Operational Properties, Journal of Machine Engineering, 15/1, 5–24.
 
17.
CHICCO D., SICHENZE A., JURMAN G., 2025, A Simple Guide to the Use of Student’s T-Test, Mann-Whitney U Test, Chi-Squared Test, and Kruskal-Wallis Test in Biostatistics, BioData Mining, 18/1, 56, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040....
 
18.
SOUSA A.R., 2018, Metrological Evaluation of a Coordinate Measuring Machine with 5-Axis Measurement Technology, Procedia CIRP, 75, 367–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proc....
 
19.
LI R.-J., FAN K.-C., HUANG Q.-X., ZHOU H., GONG E.-M., XIANG M., 2016, A Long-Stroke 3D Contact Scanning Probe for Micro/Nano Coordinate Measuring Machine, Precision Engineering, 43, 220–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prec....
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top