Investigation on the Relationship Between the Vibratory Peening Process Parameters and Almen Intensity
 
More details
Hide details
1
Génie Mécanique, Polytechnique Montréal, Canada
 
2
Département de Matériaux & Procédés, Safran Tech, France
 
 
Submission date: 2023-04-06
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-05-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-05-27
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-05-30
 
 
Publication date: 2023-09-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Martin Etienne   

Génie Mécanique, Polytechnique Montréal, Succ. Centre-Ville, H3C 3A7, Montréal, Canada
 
 
Journal of Machine Engineering 2023;23(3):98-115
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Vibratory peening is a mechanical surface treatment process to improve both the fatigue life and smooth surface finish of metallic components in a single operation. Almen intensity is a significant parameter to relate the compressive residual stresses induced by the peening processes. In this study, the design of experiments (DOE) was used to investigate the effect of seven vibratory peening process parameters on Almen intensity. A specific vibratory peening machine, with the tub vibrating in a vertical pattern and resting on airbags, was built. Two empirical linear models were fitted. First, a screening model with primary effects showed that the media mass, airbag pressure, specimen longitudinal position, and lubrication rate have minor influence on Almen intensity. Secondly, a definitive model showed that high eccentricity, high frequency, and deep specimen immersion are required to reach high Almen intensities. The complex interactions between eccentricity, immersion depth, and frequency are described.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
GANE D.H., RUMYANTSEV Y.S., DIEP H.T., BAKOW L., 2003, Evaluation of Vibrostrengthening for Fatigue Enhancement of Titanium Structural Components on Commercial Aircraft, Ti-2003 Science and Technology, Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Titanium, Hamburg, Germany, 1053–8.
 
2.
DELOSRIOS E.R., WALLEY A., MILAN M.T., HAMMERSLEY G., 1995, Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation on Shot-Peened Surfaces in A316 Stainless Steel, International Journal of Fatigue, 17, 493–499.
 
3.
DOWLING N. E., 1998, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, ISBN-10 013905720X.
 
4.
MEDIRATTA R., AHLUWALIA K., YEO S.H., 2016, State-of-the-art on Vibratory Finishing in the Aviation Industry: An Industrial and Academic Perspective, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 85, 415–29.
 
5.
FELDMANN G., WONG C.C., WEI W., HAUBOLD T., 2014, Application of Vibropeening on Aero – Engine Component, Procedia CIRP, 13, 423–428.
 
6.
SANGID M.D., STORI J.A., FERRIERA P.M., 2011, Process Characterization of Vibrostrengthening and Application to Fatigue Enhancement of Aluminum Aerospace Components–Part I, Experimental Study of Process Parameters, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 53, 545–60.
 
7.
CANALS L., BADREDDINE J., MCGILLIVRAY B., MIAO H.Y., LEVESQUE M., 2019, Effect of Vibratory Peening on the Sub-Surface Layer of Aerospace Materials Ti-6Al-4V and E-16NiCrMo13, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 264, 91–106.
 
8.
CHAN W.L., AHLUWALIA K., GOPINATH A., 2019, Parametric Study of Fixtured Vibropeening, Metals, 9, 910.
 
9.
GOPINATH A., CHAN W.L., KUMAR A.S., 2020, Data Driven Optimization of Vibropeening, Procedia CIRP, 87, 285–90.
 
10.
KUMAR D., IDAPALAPATI S., WANG W., 2021, Influence of Residual Stress Distribution and Microstructural Characteristics on Fatigue Failure Mechanism in Ni‐Based Superalloy, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mat. Struct., 44, 1583–601.
 
11.
ALCARAZ J.Y., ZHANG J., NAGALINGAM A.P., GOPASETTY S.K., TOH B.L., GOPINATH A., AHLUWALIA K., ANG M.G.W., YEO S.H., 2022, Numerical Modeling of Residual Stresses During Vibratory Peening of a 3-Stage Blisk – a Multi-Scale Discrete Element and Finite Element Approach, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 299, 117383.
 
12.
CAO W., FATHALLAH R., CASTEX L., 1995, Correlation of Almen Arc Height with Residual Stresses in Shot Peening Process, Materials Science and Technology, 11, 967–973.
 
13.
MIAO H.Y., LAROSE S., PERRON C., LEVESQUE M., 2010, An Analytical Approach to Relate Shot Peening Parameters to Almen Intensity, Surface Coatings Technology, 205/7, 2055–2066.
 
14.
SAE STANDARD J443, 2010, Procedures for Using Standard Shot Peening Almen Strip, https://www.sae.org/standards/....
 
15.
KUMAR D., IDAPALAPATI S., WANG W., CHILD D.J., HAUBOLD T., WONG C.C., 2019, Microstructure-Mechanical Property Correlation in Shot Peened and Vibro-Peened Ni-Based Superalloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 267, 215–229.
 
16.
SAE STANDARD J442, 2009, Test Strip, Holder, and Gage for Shot Peening, https://webstore.ansi.org/stan....
 
17.
SAE STANDARD J2597, 2009, Computer Generated Shot Peening Saturation Curves, https://www.sae.org/standards/....
 
18.
MONTGOMERY D. C, 2012, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley.
 
19.
SAE STANDARD AMS2430, 2015, Shot Peening, Automatic, https://www.sae.org/standards/....
 
20.
WANG S., TIMSIT R.S., SPELT J.K., 2000, Experimental Investigation of Vibratory Finishing of Aluminum, Wear, 243, 147–56.
 
21.
HASHIMOTO F., JOHNSON S.P., CHAUDHARI R.G., 2016, Modeling of Material Removal Mechanism in Vibratory Finishing Process, CIRP Annals, 65, 325–328.
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top