Application of TOPSIS an PIV Methods for Multi - Criteria Decision Making in Hard Turning Process
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Hanoi University of Industry, Viet Nam
Submission date: 2021-08-10
Final revision date: 2021-09-11
Acceptance date: 2021-09-26
Online publication date: 2021-09-29
Publication date: 2021-12-08
Corresponding author
Do Duc Trung
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Hanoi University of Industry, Cau Dien, 100000, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Journal of Machine Engineering 2021;21(4):57-71
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this study, TOPSIS and PIV methods were applied for multi-criteria decision making in hard turning process. Experiments have been conducted in accordance with an experimental matrix designed by the Taguchi method with a total of twenty-seven experiments. At each experiment, the values of coolant concentration, nose radius, coolant flow, cutting velocity, feed rate and depth of cut have been changed. Surface roughness, flank wear and roundess error have been selected as output criteria. The weights of criteria have been determined by three methods, inclusive of Equal weight, ROC weight and Entropy weight. The combination of multi-criteria decision-making methods with three weighting methods gives six ranking options of the experiments. The purpose of ranking the experiments is to find the experiment at which the three output parameters are ensured to have the minimum value simultaneously.
REFERENCES (38)
1.
TRUNG D.D., NGUYEN N. –T., DUC D.V., 2021, Study on Multi-Objective Optimization of the Turning Process of EN 10503 Steel by Combination of Teguchi Method and Moora Technique, EUREKA, Physics and Engineering, 2021/2, 52–65.
2.
DENKENA B., BERGMANN B., HANDRUP M., WITT M., 2020, Material Identification During Turning by Neural Network, Journal of Machine Engineering, 20/2, 65–76.
3.
OPRICOVIC S., TZENG G.-H., 2004, Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156/2, 445–455.
4.
HWANG C.–L., LAI Y.–J., LIU T.-Y., 1993, A New Approach for Multiple Objective Decision Making, Computers & Operations Research, 20/8, 889–899.
5.
MUFAZZAL S., MUZAKKIR S.M., 2018, A New Multi-Criterion Decision Making (MCDM) Method Based on Proximity Indexed Value for Minimizing Rank Reversals, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1–38.
6.
YAKUP C., FATIH T., 2020, An in-Depth Review of Theory of The TOPSIS Method: An Experimental Analysis, Journal of Management Analytics, 7/2, 1–21.
7.
SINGH A., DATTA S., MAHAPATRA S.S., 2011, Application of TOPSIS in the Taguchi Method for Optimal Machining Parameter Selection, Journal for Manufacturing Science & Production, 11, 49-60.
8.
PARIDA A.K., ROUTARA B.C., 2014, Multiresponse Optimization of Process Parameters in Turning of GFRP Using TOPSIS Method, International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, 1–10.
9.
RAO C.M., RAO K.J., RAO K.L., 2016, Multi-Objective Optimization of MRR, Ra and Rz Using Topsis, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 5/9, 376–384.
10.
PRAKASH D.B., KRISHNAIAH G., SHANKAR N.V.S., 2016, Optimization of Process Parameters Udding AHP and TOPSIS when Turning 1040 Steel with Coated Tools, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 7/6, 483–492.
11.
MAITY K., KHAN A., 2017, Application of MCDM-Based TOPSIS Method for the Selection of Optimal Process Parameter in Turning of Pure Titanium, Benchmarking, An International Journal, 24/7, 2009–2021.
12.
KHAN A., MAITY K., 2019, Application Potential Of Combined Fuzzy-TOPSIS Approach in Minimization of Surface Roughness, Cutting Force and Tool Wear During Machining of CP-Ti Grade II, Soft Computing, 23, 6667–6678.
13.
SINGH R., DUREJA J.S., DOGRA M., RANDHAWA J.S., 2019, Optimization of Machining Parameters Under MQL Turning of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Textured Tool Using Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods, World Journal of Engineering, 6/5, 648–659.
14.
MANE S.S., MULLA A.M., 2020, Relevant Optimization Method Selection in Turning of AISI D2 STEEL Steel Using Cryogenic Cooling, International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 8/10, 803–812.
15.
RAO S.R., JEELANI S.A.K., SWAMULU V., 2021, Multi-Objective Optimization Using TOPSIS in Turning of Al 6351 Alloy, IOP Conf. Series, Materials Science and Engineering, 1112/012010, 1–10.
16.
[16] DICH T.V., BINH N.T., DAT N.T., TIEP N.V., VIET T.X., 2003, Manufacturing Technology, Science and Technics Publishing House, Hanoi.
17.
TANABE I., YAMAGAMI Y., HOSHINO H., 2020, Development of a New High-Pressure Cooling System for Machining of Difficulut-to-Machine Materials, Journal of Machine Engineering, 20/1, 82–97.
18.
PHADKE M.S., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Printice Hall.
19.
ROSZKOWSKA E., 2013, Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – A Comparative Overview, Journal Dedicated to the Needs of Science and Practice, 5/65, 1–168.
20.
KHAN N.Z., ANSARI T. S.A., SIDDIQUEE A.N., KHAN Z.A., 2019, Selection of E Learning Websites Using a Novel Proximity Indexed Value (PIV) MCDM Method, Journal of Computers in Education, 6, 241–256.
21.
WAKEEL S., BINGOL S., BASIR M.N., AHMAD S., 2020, Selection of Sustainable Material for the Manufacturing of Complex Automotive Products Using a New Hybrid Goal Programming Model For Best Worst Method–Proximity Indexed Value Method, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 235/2, 1-15.
22.
ULUTAS A., KARAKOY C., 2019, An Analysis of the Logistics Performance Index of EU Countries with an Integrated MCDM Model, Economics and Business Review, 5/4, 49–69.
23.
RAIGAR J., SHARMA V.S., SRIVASTAVA S., CHAND R., SINGH J., 2020, A Decision Support System for the Selection of an Additive Manufacturing Process Using a New Hybrid MCDM Technique, Sadhana, 45/101, 1–14.
24.
DAWES R. M., COORIGAN B., 1974, Linear Models in Decision Malking, Psychological Bulletin, 81/2, 95–106.
25.
EINHORN H.J., MCCOACH W., 1997, A Symble Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation, Behavioral Scicence, 22/4, 270–282.
26.
YUXIN Z., DAZUO T., FENG Y., 2020, Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-Making, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 1–5.
27.
KLOCKE F., BRINKSMEIER E., WEINERT K., 2005, Capability Profile of Hard Cutting and Grinding Processes, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 54/2, 22–45.
28.
KO T.J., KIM H.S., 2001, Surface Integrity and Machineability in Intermittent Hard Turning, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 18, 168–175.
30.
UYEN V.T.N., SON N.H., 2020, Improving Accuracy of Surface Roughness Model While Turning 9XC Steel Using a Titanium Nitride-Coated Cutting Tool with Johnson and Box-Cox Transformation, AIMS Mat. Science, 8/1, 1–17.
31.
RPADEEP A.V., SURYAM L.V., PRASAS S.V.S., VAHINI K., 2018, Experimental Investigation and Comparison of Flank Wear and Surface Roughness in Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Using Ceramic Coated and Uncoated Carbide Inserts, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, 8/5, 337–346.
32.
GUPTA D.V.K., SHARMA V.S., DOGRA M., 2010, Wear Mechanisms of Tin-Coated CBN Tool During Finish Hard Turning of Hot Tool Die Steel, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 224/4, 553–566.
33.
TRUNG D.D., 2021, Influence of Cutting Parameters on Surface Roughness in Grinding of 65G Steel, Tribology in Industry, 43/1, 167–176.
34.
GROOVER M.P., 1996, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
35.
SILVA R.B.D., MACHADO A.R., EZUGWU E.O., BONNEY J., SALES W.F., 2013, Tool Life and Wear Mechanisms in High Speed Machining of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy with PCD Tools Under Various Coolant Pressures, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213/8, 1459–1464.
36.
GONZALEZ L.W.H., AHMED Y.S., RODRIGUEZ R.P., RODLEDO P.D.C.Z., MATA M.P.G., 2018, Selection of Machining Parameters Using a Correlative Study of Cutting Tool Wear in High-Speed Turning of AISI 1045 Steel, Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2/66, 1–14.
37.
XU W., WU Y., SATO T., LIN W., 2010, Effects of Process Parameters on Workpiece Roundness in Tangential-Feed Centerless Grinding Using A Surface Grinder, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210/5, 759–766.
38.
MAJUMDER H., SAHA A., 2018, Application of MCDM Based Hybrid Optimization Tool During Turning of ASTM A588, Decision Science Letters, 7, 143–156.
CITATIONS (33):
1.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the PMEDM Process by Using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA Methods
Huu-Quang Nguyen, Van-Tung Nguyen, Dang-Phong Phan, Quoc-Hoang Tran, Ngoc-Pi Vu
Applied Sciences
2.
Applying Cocoso, Mabac, Mairca, Eamr, Topsis and Weight Determination Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Hole Turning Process
Duc Trung Do, Nhu-Tung Nguyen
Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
3.
Advances in Engineering Research and Application
Bui Thanh Danh, Tran Huu Danh, Vu Van Khoa, Pham Duc Lam, Nguyen Hong Linh, Nguyen Van Tung, Bui Thanh Hien
4.
Decısıon makıng for car selectıon ın Vıetnam
Do Duc Trung, Dung Hoang Tien, Nguyen Hoai Son
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
5.
A Comparative Study on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Dressing Process for Internal Grinding
Huu-Quang Nguyen, Xuan-Hung Le, Thanh-Tu Nguyen, Quoc-Hoang Tran, Ngoc-Pi Vu
Machines
6.
Advances in Engineering Research and Application
Trieu Quy Huy, Nguyen Hong Linh, Tra n Huu Danh, Bui Thanh Danh, Do Thi Tam, Luu Anh Tung, Le Xuan Hung
7.
DOE-MARCOS: A new approach to multi-criteria decision making
Trung Duc, Son Hong, Hieu Trung, Nhu Thi
Journal of Applied Engineering Science
8.
Combination of DOE and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making
Trung Duc, Tan Ngoc
Journal of Applied Engineering Science
9.
COMPARISON R AND CURLI METHODS FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
Do Duc Trung
Advanced Engineering Letters
10.
Combined PIPRECIA method and modified FUCA method for selection of lathe
Do Trung, Nguyen Truong, Hoang Thinh
Journal of Applied Engineering Science
11.
The Surface Roughness Model When Turning of 1066 Steel by TiC Insert
Do Thi Kim Lien, Nguyen Dinh Man, Phung Tran Dinh, Nguyen Duy Chien
International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology
12.
A study on multi-criteria decision-making in powder mixed electric discharge machining cylindrical shaped parts
Tran Huu Danh, Trieu Quy Huy, Pham Duc Lam, Nguyen Manh Cuong, Hoang Xuan Tu, Vu Ngoc Pi
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
13.
Optimization of Technological Parameters when Plasma Nitriding the Gear Working Surface
Bui Thanh Danh, Le Hong Ky
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
14.
Expanding the Data Normalization Strategy to the MACONT Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Anh-Tu Nguyen
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
15.
New Technologies, Development and Application VII
Do Duc Trung, Aleksandar Ašonja, Duong Van Duc, Nong Thi Thanh Nga
16.
Multi-criteria decision making of turning operation based on PEG, PSI and CURLI methods
Do Duc Trung
Manufacturing Review
17.
EVALUATION OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF BANKS REGISTERED ON BIST WITH AHP-SD BASED PIV METHOD
Burhan ERDOĞAN
Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute
18.
Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach
Setiawansyah, Ahmad Ari Aldino, Pritasari Palupiningsih, Gibtha Fitri Laxmi, Elvano Delisa Mega, Ika Septiana
2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT)
19.
Surface Roughness Modeling of Hard Turning 080A67 Steel
Bui Thanh Danh, Nguyen Van Cuong
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
20.
Application of multi-criteria decision-making method to choose rice harvester in Vietnam
Tran Van Dua
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
21.
Building a Ranking System for Lecturers Based on Student Evaluations in Teaching a Specific Course: A Case Study at a University in Vietnam
Do Duc Trung, Branislav Dudić, Duong Van Duc, Nguyen Hoai Son, Alexandra Mittelman
International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE)
22.
Dijital Pazarlama Teknolojilerinin PIV ve CODAS Yöntemleri ile Analizi
Murat Kemal KELEŞ, Duygu ALACA
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi
23.
Disruptive Information Technologies for a Smart Society
Rajko Turudija, Ljiljana Radović, Aleksandar Stanković, Miloš Stojković
24.
Application of the Curli method for multi-critical decision of grinding process
Do Trung, Nghien Ba, Dung Tien
Journal of Applied Engineering Science
25.
Combination of symmetry point of criterion, compromise ranking of alternatives from distance to ideal solution and collaborative unbiased rank list integration methods for woodworking machinery selection for small business in Vietnam
Tran Van Dua
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
26.
Comparison of the RAFSI and PIV method in multi-criteria decision making: application to turning processes
Do Duc Trung, Hoang Xuan Thinh, Le Dang Ha
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering
27.
Application of EDAS, MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA and PIV Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Milling Process
Do Duc Trung
Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
28.
Optimizing growth conditions in vertical farming: enhancing lettuce and basil cultivation through the application of the Taguchi method
Hadis Farhangi, Vahid Mozafari, Hamid Reza Roosta, Hossein Shirani, Mosen Farhangi
Scientific Reports
29.
Multi-Objective Optimization of Turning Process by Fuca Method
Xuan Thinh Hoang
Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
30.
Expert opinion-based multi objective optimization: an application in plasma coating technology
Vu Duong, Nguyen Van Cuong
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
31.
Disaster readiness assessment model using integrated statistical variance and proximity value index
Agung Sutrisno, Cynthia Erlita Virgin Wuisang, Ade Yusupa
International Journal of Emergency Services
32.
MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN THE POWDER-MIXED ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE MACHINING PROCESS BASED ON THE COCOSO, SPOTIS ALGORITHMS AND THE WEIGHTING METHODS
Huy-Anh Bui, Ngoc-Tien Tran, Duc-Luan Nguyen
International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies
33.
Combining FUCA, CURLI, and Weighting Methods in the Decision-Making of Selecting Technical Products
Anh-Tu Nguyen
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research