Compliant Joints with Remote Centre of Compliance for the Improvement of the Motion Accuracy of a Gantry Stage
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Institute of Mechatronic Engineering, Chair of Machine Tools Development and Adaptive Controls, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
 
2
Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology, Fraunhofer IWU, Germany
 
 
Submission date: 2022-02-18
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-05-05
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-05-09
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-05-16
 
 
Publication date: 2022-06-28
 
 
Corresponding author
Pöhlmann Patrick   

Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Institute of Mechatronic Engineering, Chair of Machine Tools Development and Adaptive Controls, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
 
 
Journal of Machine Engineering 2022;22(2):68-79
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Gantry stages, which consist of two parallel acting servo drives, are commonly used in machine tools. One drawback of this concept is the crosstalk between both drives. This can lead to a limited bandwidth of the position control or to high reaction forces. One way to overcome these issues is the usage of joints to create an additional degree of freedom. One benefit of compliant joints is the variability to adjust the position of each joint’s centre of compliance to change the transfer matrix between the motion of the drives and the tool centre point. This paper addresses the placement of the joint’s centre of compliance in order to improve motion accuracy. The characteristics of the joints and their effect on the behaviour of the gantry stage are compared using analytic investigations as well as experimental results.
 
REFERENCES (10)
1.
HIRAMOTO K., HANSEL A., DING S., YAMAZAKI K., 2005, A Study on the Drive at Center of Gravity (DCG) Feed Principle and Its Application for Development of High Performance Machine Tool Systems, CIRP Annals, 45/1, 333–336.
 
2.
PEUKERT C., MERX M., MÜLLER J., IHLENFELDT S., 2017, Flexible Coupling of Drive and Guide Elements for Parallel-Driven Feed Axes to Increase Dynamics and Accuracy of Motion, Journal of Machine Engineering, 17/2, 77–89.
 
3.
HARCIA-HERREROS I., HESTELYN X., GOMAND J., COLEMAN R., BARRE P.; 2013, Model-Based Decoupling Control Method for Dual-Drive Gantry Stages: A Case Study with Experimental Validations, Control Engineering Practice, 21/3, 298–307.
 
4.
HOWELL L.L., MAGLEBY S.P., OLSEN B.M., 2013, Handbook of Compliant Mechanisms, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
 
5.
PÖHLMANN P., PEUKERT C., MERX M., MÜLLER J., IHLENFELDT S., 2020, Compliant Joints for the Improvement of the Dynamic Behaviour of a Gantry Stage with Direct Drives, Journal of Machine Engineering, 20/3, 17–29.
 
6.
ELFIZY A.T., BONE G.M., ELBESTAWI M.A., 2005, Design and Control of a Dual-Stage Feed Drive, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45/2, 153–165.
 
7.
IHLENFELDT S., MÜLLER J., MERX M., PEUKERT C., 2018, A Novel Concept for Highly Dynamic Over-Actuated Lightweight Machine Tools, Reinventing Mechatronics: Proceedings of Mechatronics, 210–216.
 
8.
KIM K., AHN D., GWEON D., 2012, Optimal Design of a 1-Rotational DOF Flexure Joint for a 3-DOF H-Type Stage, Mechatronics, 22/1, 24–32.
 
9.
HOPKINS J.B., CULPEPPER M.L., 2010, Synthesis of Multi-Degree of Freedom, Parallel Flexure System Concepts via Freedom and Constraint Topology (FACT) - Part I: Principles, Precision Engineering, 34/2, 259–270.
 
10.
CIBLAK N., LIPKIN H., 2003, Design and Analysis of Remote Center of Compliance Structures, Journal of Robotic Systems, 20/8, 415–427.
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top