The prediction of machining processes is a challenging task and usually requires a large experimental basis. These experiments are time-consuming and require manufacturing and testing of different tool geometries at various process conditions to find optimum machining settings. In this paper, a machine learning model of the orthogonal cutting process of Ti6Al4V is proposed to predict the cutting and feed forces for a wide range of process conditions with regards to rake angle, clearance angle, cutting edge radius, feed and cutting speed. The model uses training data generated by virtual experiments, which are conducted using physical based simulations of the orthogonal cutting process with the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). The ML training set is composed of input parameters, and output process forces from 2500 instances of GPU accelerated SPH simulations. The resulting model provides fast process force predictions and can consider the cutter geometry in comparison to classical analytical approaches.
REFERENCES(37)
1.
KIENZLE O., 1952, Die Bestimmung von Kräften und Leistungen an spanenden Werkzeugen und Werkzeugma-schinen, VDI-Z, 94, 299–305.
MERCHANT M.E, 1945, Mechanics of the Metal Cutting Process. II. Plasticity Conditions in Orthogonal Cutting, Journal of applied physics, 16/6, 318–324.
ADIBI-SEDEH A.H., MADHAVAN V., BAHR B., 2003, Extension of Oxley’s Analysis of Machining to Use Different Material Models, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 125/4, 656–666.
LALWANI D.I.; MEHTA N.K., JAIN P.K., 2009, Extension of Oxley's Predictive Machining Theory for Johnson and Cook Flow Stress Model, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209/12–13, 5305–5312.
ARRAZOLA P.J, ÖZEL T., UMBRELLO D., DAVIES M., JAWAHIR I.S., 2013, Recent Advances in Modelling of Metal Machining Processes, Cirp Annals, 62/2, 695–718.
RÖTHLIN M., KLIPPEL H., AFRASIABI M., WEGENER K., 2019, Metal Cutting Simulations Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics on the GPU, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 102/ 9–12, 3445–3457.
GINGOLD R.A., MONAGHAN J.J., 1977, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Theory and Application to Non-Spherical Stars, Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society, 181/3, 375–389.
AFRASIABI M., RÖTHLIN M., WEGENER K., 2019, Contemporary Meshfree Methods for Three Dimensional Heat Conduction Problems, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1–35.
AFRASIABI M., MEIER L., RÖTHLIN M., KLIPPEL H., WEGENER K., 2020, GPU-Accelerated Meshfree Simulations for Parameter Identification of a Friction Model in Metal Machining, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 105571.
AFRASIABI M., RÖTHLIN M., KLIPPEL H., WEGENER K., 2019, Meshfree Simulation of Metal Cutting: an Updated Lagrangian Approach with Dynamic Refinement, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 160, 451–466.
RÖTHLIN M., KLIPPEL H., AFRASIABI M., WEGENER K., 2019, Meshless Single Grain Cutting Simulations on the GPU, International Journal of Mechatronics and Manufacturing Systems, 12/3–4, 272–297.
JOHNSON G.R., COOK W.H., 1983, A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperatures, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, 21/1.
JUMPER J., EVANS R., PRITZEL A., GREEN T., FIGURNOV M., RONNEBERGER O., TUNYASUVUNAKOOL K., BATES R., ŽÍDEK A., POTAPENKO A., BRIDGLAND A., 2021. Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold, Nature, 596, 583–589.
CARLEO G., CIRAC I., CRANMER K., DAUDET L., SCHULD M., TISHBY N., VOGT-MARANTO L. ZDEBOROVÁ L., 2019, Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences. Reviews of Modern Physics, 91/4, 045002.
JAKOB J., GROSS M., GÜNTHER T., 2020, A Fluid Flow Data Set for Machine Learning and its Application to Neural Flow Map Interpolation, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27/2, 1279–1289.
LANGER M.F., GOESSMANN A., RUPP M., 2020, Representations of Molecules and Materials for Interpolation of Quantum-Mechanical Simulations via Machine Learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.12081.
SHI C., WANG Y., 2021, Non-Parametric Machine Learning Methods for Interpolation of Spatially Varying Non-Stationary and Non-Gaussian Geotechnical Properties, Geoscience Frontiers, 121, .339–350.
DUCOBU F., ARRAZOLA P.J., RIVIÈRE-LORPHÈVRE E., FILIPPI E., 2021, On the Selection of an Empirical Material Constitutive Model for the Finite Element Modelling of Ti6Al4V Orthogonal Cutting, Including the Segmented Chip Formation, International Journal of Material Forming, 3.
ALBRECHT P., 1960, New Developments in the Theory of the Metal-Cutting Process: Part I. The Ploughing Process in Metal Cutting, Journal of Engineering for Industry, 82/4, 348–357.
BABU B., LINDGREN L.E., 2013, Dislocation Density Based Model for Plastic Deformation and Globularization of Ti-6Al-4V, International Journal of Plasticity, 50, 94–108.
RODRIGUEZ J.M., LARSSON S., CARBONELL J.M., JONSÉN P., 2020, Dislocation Density Based Flow Stress Model Applied to the PFEM Simulation of Orthogonal Cutting Processes of Ti-6Al-4V, Materials, 13/8, 1979, https://doi.org/10.3390/ ma13081979.
PAN Z., LIANG S.Y., GARMESTANI H., SHIH D.S., 2016, Prediction of Machining-Induced Phase Transformation and Grain Growth of Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 87/1, 859–866.
MOUFKI A., MOLINARI A., DUDZINSKI D., 1998, Modelling of Orthogonal Cutting with a Temperature Dependent Friction Law, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 46/10, 2103–2138.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.