Influence of Different Machining Processes on Fatigue life Performance of Engineered Surfaces: a Short Review
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Former affiliation: Opole University of Technology, Emeritus Professor
 
 
Submission date: 2022-05-09
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-05-20
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-05-22
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-05-24
 
 
Publication date: 2022-06-28
 
 
Corresponding author
Wit Grzesik   

E-mail: w.grzesik@gmail.com
 
 
Journal of Machine Engineering 2022;22(2):18-30
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this paper fundamental information on the influence of the real machined surfaces generated by different machining processes on the fatigue life of machine parts are presented. In the first part the various approaches for the assessment of the stress concentration factor and the correction of a fatigue life limit are discussed. In the second part the results of standard fatigue tests are compared with computed data and predictions using FEM based simulations. The effect of surface discontinues (valleys) in the real surface profiles is related to engineered parts made of different materials including steels, aluminium alloys, aerospace alloys and composites.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
GRZESIK W., 2016, Prediction of the Functional Performance of Machined Components Based on Surface Topography: State of the Art, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 25/10, 4460–4468.
 
2.
GRZESIK W., 2016, Influence of Surface Textures Produced by Finishing Operations on their Functional Properties, Journal of Machine Engineering, 16/1, 15–23.
 
3.
GRZESIK W., 2019, Influence of Surface Roughness on Fatigue Life of Machine Elements – Developments in Experimental Investigations and Simulation, Mechanik, 5–6, https://doi.org/10.17814/mecha....
 
4.
HASHIMOTO F., CHAUDHARI R.G., MELKOTE S.N., 2016, Characteristics and Performance of Surfaces Created by Various Finishing Methods, Procedia CIRP, 45, 1–6.
 
5.
KOCANDA S., KOCANDA A., 1989, Low-Cycle Fatigue Strength of Metals, PWN, Warsaw, (in Polish).
 
6.
SCHIJVE J., 2009, Fatigue of Structures and Materials, Milton Keynes, Springer.
 
7.
GRZESIK W., ZAK K., CHUDY R., PRAZMOWSKI M., MALECKA J., 2019, Optimization of Subtractive-Transformative Hybrid Processes Supported by the Technological Heredity Concept, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 68, 101–104.
 
8.
GAO S., ZHANG Q., 2013, Influence of Machined Surface Integrity on Fatigue Performance, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 373–375, 1999–2003.
 
9.
NOVOCIC D., DEWES R.C., ASPINWALL D.K., VOICE W., BOWEN P., 2004, The Effect of Machined Topography and Integrity on Fatigue Life, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44/2–3, 125–134.
 
10.
XIAO W.L., CHEN H.B., YIN Y., 2013, Effects of Surface Roughness on the Fatigue Life of Alloy Steel, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 373–375, 417–420.
 
11.
DENG G., NAGAMOTO K., NAKANO Y., NAKANISHI T., 2009, Evaluation of the Effect of Surface Roughness on Crack Initiation Life, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Fracture (ICF12), Ottawa, Canada, 2, 1505–1512.
 
12.
AROLA D., WILLIAMS C.L., 2002, Estimating the Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor of Machined Surfaces, International Journal of Fatigue, 24, 923–930.
 
13.
AROLA D., WILLIAMS C.L., 2002, Surface Texture, Fatigue, and Reduction in Stiffness of Fiber Reinforced Plastics, Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 124, 160–166.
 
14.
AS S.K., SKALLERUD B., TVEITEN B.W., HOLME B., 2005, Fatigue life Prediction of Machined Components Using Finite Element Analysis of Surface Topography, International Journal of Fatigue, 27, 1590–1596.
 
15.
YANG D., LIU Z., XIAO X., XIE F., 2018, The Effects of Machining-Induced Surface Topography on Fatigue Performance of Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V, Procedia CIRP, 71 27–30.
 
16.
SURARATCHAI M., LIMIDO J., MABRU C., CHIERAGATTI R., 2008, Modelling the Influence of Machined Surface Roughness on the Fatigue Life of Aluminium Alloy, International Journal of Fatigue, 30 (2008), 2119–2126.
 
17.
RAO J.H., ZHANG K., ROMETSCH P., HUANG A., WU X., 2018, The Influence of Surface Roughness on the Fatigue Performance of Selective Laser Melted Aluminium Alloy A357, Proceedings of the 16th International Aluminium Alloys Conference (ICAA16), Canada.
 
18.
ARDI D.T., LI Y.G., CHAN K.H., BLUNT L., BACHE M.R. 2014, The Effects of Machined Topography on Fatigue Life of a Nickel Based Superalloy, Procedia CIRP, 13, 19–24.
 
19.
LEACH R. (ed.), 2013, Characterization of Areal Surface Texture, Springer, Heilderberg.
 
20.
DUMAS M., CABANETTES F., KAMINSKI R., VALIORGUE F., PICOT E., LEFEBVRE F., GROSJEAN C., RECH J., 2018, Influence of the Finish Cutting Operations on the Fatigue Performance of Ti-6Al-4V Parts Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Procedia CIRP, 71, 429–434.
 
21.
BURAKOWSKI T., 2013, Areology. Theoeretical Fundamentals, Scientific Publ. of ITE, Radom, (in Polish).
 
22.
GRZESIK W., RUSZAJ A., 2021, Hybrid Manufacturing Processes, PNT, Warsaw.
 
eISSN:2391-8071
ISSN:1895-7595
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top