Towards Sustainable and Intelligent Machining: Energy Footprint and Tool Condition Monitoring for Media-Assisted Processes
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, United Kingdom
Submission date: 2023-04-07
Final revision date: 2023-05-22
Acceptance date: 2023-05-24
Online publication date: 2023-05-24
Publication date: 2023-06-12
Corresponding author
Journal of Machine Engineering 2023;23(2):16-40
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Reducing energy consumption is a necessity in achieving the goal of net-zero manufacturing. In this keynote paper, the energy footprint of machining Ti-6Al-4V using various cooling/lubrication methods is investigated taking the embodied energy in cutting tools and cutting fluids into account. The investigations show the significance of cutting tool’s embodied energy. New cooling/lubrication methods such as WS2-oil suspension can reduce the energy footprint of machining through extending tool life. Cutting tools are commonly replaced early before reaching their end of useful life to prevent damage to the workpiece, effectively wasting a portion of the embodied energy in cutting tools. A deep learning method is trained and tested to identify when a tool change is required based on sensor signals from a wireless sensory toolholder. The results indicated that the network is capable of correctly classifying the tool condition with over 90% accuracy.
REFERENCES (56)
1.
UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, United Nations, https://sustainabledevelopment... %20Development%20web.pdf., (Accessed on: 13 Mar 2023).
2.
IEA, 2021, Electricity Information: Overview, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/el..., License: CC BY 4.0.
3.
IEA, 2018, Manufacturing Energy Consumption by Sub-Sector in IEA Countries, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org /data-and-statistics/charts/manufacturing-energy-consumption-by-sub-sector-in-iea-countries-2018, IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0.
4.
SIHAG N., SANGWAN K.S., 2020, A Systematic Literature Review On Machine Tool Energy Consumption, Journal of Cleaner Production, 275/123125.
5.
SHAO G., KIBIRA D., LYONS K., 2010, A Virtual Machining Model for Sustainability Analysis, ASME, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
6.
KARA S., LI W., 2011, Unit Process Energy Consumption Models for Material Removal Processes, CIRP Annals 60/1, 37–40.
7.
SHOKRANI A., DHOKIA V., NEWMAN S.T., 2012, Environmentally Conscious Machining of Difficult-to-Machine Materials with Regard to Cutting Fluids, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 57/ 83–101.
8.
SHOKRANI A., DHOKIA V., NEWMAN S.T., 2014, A Techno-Health Study of the Use of Cutting Fluids and Future Alternatives, 24th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM 2014 - San Antonio, USA United States.
9.
GRZESIK W., 2021, Nanofluid Assistance in Machining Processes–Properties, Mechanisms and Applications: A Review, Journal of Machine Engineering 21/2, 75–90.
10.
STATISTA, 2014–2021, Forecasting Machining Revenue, Based on Various Reports by Statista Research Department on Forecasting Machining Revenue, (Accessed on: 13 Mar 2023).
11.
ITURBE A., HORMAETXE E., GARAY A., ARRAZOLA P.J., 2016, Surface Integrity Analysis when Machining Inconel 718 with Conventional and Cryogenic Cooling, Procedia CIRP, 45, 67–70.
12.
PEREIRA O., CELAYA A., URBIKAIN G., RODRIGUEZ A., FERNANDEZ-VALDIVIELSO A., LACALLE L.N.L.D., 2020, CO2 Cryogenic Milling of Inconel 718: Cutting Forces and Tool Wear, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9/4, 8459–8468.
13.
NOUZIL I., ELTAGGAZ A., PERVAIZ S., DEIAB I., 2022, Toxicity Analysis of Nano-Minimum Quantity Lubrication Machining – A Review, Lubricants, 10/8, 176.
14.
SALEM A., HOPKINS C., IMAD M., HEGAB H., DARRAS B., KISHAWY H.A., 2020, Environmental Analysis of Sustainable and Traditional Cooling and lubrication Strategies During Machining Processes, Sustainability, 12/20, 8462.
15.
FORTUNE BUSINESS INSIGHTS, 2022, Metal Cutting Tools Market- FBI101751, Fortune Business Insights.
16.
STEELS AND METALS RESEARCH GMBH, 2018, Tungsten in 2017 – EndUse Consumption International Tungsten Industry Association, https://itia.info/assets/files... tion.pdf.
17.
WIKLUND H., 1998, Bayesian and Regression Approaches to on‐Line Prediction of Residual Tool Life, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 14/5, 303–309.
18.
TETI R., MOURTZIS D., D'ADDONA D.M., CAGGIANO A., 2022, Process Monitoring of Machining, CIRP Annals, 71/2, 529–552.
19.
DUTTA S., PAL S.K., MUKHOPADHYAY S., SEN R., 2013, Application of Digital Image Processing in Tool Condition Monitoring: A Review, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 6/3, 212–232.
20.
KUNTOGLU M., ASLAN A., PIMENOV D.Y., USCA U.A., SALUR E., GUPTA M.K., MIKOLAJCZYK T., GIASIN K., KAPLONEK W., SHARMA S., 2020, A Review of Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Systems and Decision-Making Methods in Turning: Critical Analysis and Trends, Sensors, 21/1, 108.
21.
CAGGIANO A., ANGELONE R., NAPOLITANO F., NELE L., TETI R., 2018, Dimensionality Reduction of Sensorial Features by Principal Component Analysis for ANN Machine Learning in Tool Condition Monitoring of CFRP Drilling, Procedia CIRP, 78, 307–312.
22.
KOLNY D., WIĘCEK D., ZIOBRO P., KRAJCOVIC M., 2017, Application of a Computer Tool Monitoring System in CNC Machining Centres, Applied Computer Science, 13/4, 7–19.
23.
SEGRETO T., SIMEONE A., TETI R., 2013, Multiple Sensor Monitoring in Nickel Alloy Turning for Tool Wear Assessment via Sensor Fusion, Procedia CIRP, 12, 85–90.
24.
SHEN Y., YANG F., HABIBULLAH M.S., AHMED J., DAS A.K., ZHOU Y., HO C.L., 2021, Predicting Tool wear Size Across Multi-Cutting Conditions Using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32/6, 1753–1766.
25.
HASSAN M., SADEK A., ATTIA M.H., 2021, Novel Sensor-Based Tool Wear Monitoring Approach for Seamless Implementation in High Speed Milling Applications, CIRP Annals, 70/1, 87–90.
26.
SERIN G., SENER B., OZBAYOGLU A.M., UNVER H.O., 2020, Review of Tool Condition Monitoring in Machining and Opportunities for Deep Learning, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 109/3, 953–974.
27.
SHOKRANI A., BETTS J., 2020, A New Hybrid Minimum Quantity Lubrication System for Machining Difficult-To-Cut Materials, CIRP Annals, 69/1, 73–76.
28.
SHOKRANI A., BETTS J., CARNEVALE M., 2021, Thermal Analysis in MQL end Milling Operations, Procedia CIRP, 101, 358–361.
29.
GLOBAL INDUSTRY ANALYSTS, 2022, Tungsten – Global Market Trajectory & Analytics, Global Industry Analysts, Inc, https://www.strategyr.com/mark....
30.
STATISTA, 2022, Reserves of Tungsten Worldwide in 2022, by country, Statista, https://www.statista.com/ statistics/270453/distribution-of-tungsten-reserves-worldwide-by-country/ (Accessed: 28-Feb-2023).
31.
SHEDD K.B., 2021, Tungsten, U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2020, 178–179, https//doi.org/10.3133/mcs2020.
32.
ZEILER B., BARTL A., SCHUBERT W.-D., 2021, Recycling of Tungsten: Current Share, Economic Limitations, Technologies and Future Potential, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 98/105546.
33.
EU COMMISSION, 2020, Critical Raw Materials, European Commission, https://single-market-economy. ec. europa.eu/sectors/raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-raw-materials_en, (Accessed: 28-Feb-2023).
34.
GARSIDE M., 2023, Major Countries Based on Cobalt Reserves 2022, Statista, https://www.statista.com/stati... 264930/global-cobalt-reserves/#:~:text=As%20the%20total%20global%20cobalt,of%20the%20global%20cobalt %20reserves, (Accessed: 28-Feb-2023).
35.
RIEF M., KARPUSCHEWSKI B., KALHOEFER E., 2017, Evaluation and Modeling of the Energy Demand During Machining, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 19, 62–71.
36.
KIRSCH B., EFFGEN C., BÜCHEL M., AURICH J., 2014, Comparison of the Embodied Energy of a Grinding Wheel and an End Mill, Procedia CIRP, 15, 74–79.
37.
RAJEMI M.F., MATIVENGA P.T., ARAMCHAROEN A., 2010, Sustainable Machining: Selection of Optimum Turning Conditions Based on Minimum Energy Considerations, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18/10, 1059–1065.
38.
FURBERG A., ARVIDSSON R., MOLANDER S., 2019, Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Cemented Carbide (WC-Co) Production, Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1126–1138.
39.
SKERLOS S.J., HAYES K.F., CLARENS A.F., ZHAO F., 2008, Current Advances in Sustainable Metalworking Fluids Research, International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 1/1–2, 180–202.
40.
SCHOWANEK D., BORSBOOM-PATEL T., BOUVY A., COLLING J., DE FERRER J.A., EGGERS D., GROENKE K., GRUENENWALD T., MARTINSSON J., MCKEOWN P., MILLER B., MOONS S., NIEDERMANN K., PEREZ M., SCHNEIDER C., VIOT J.-F., 2018, New and Updated Life Cycle Inventories for Surfactants Used in European Detergents: Summary of the ERASM Surfactant Life Cycle and Ecofootprinting Project, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23/4, 86–886.
41.
RAIMONDI A., GIROTTI G., BLENGINI G.A., FINO D., 2012, LCA of Petroleum-Based Lubricants: State of Art and Inclusion of Additives, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 987–996.
42.
CLARENS A.F., ZIMMERMAN J.B., KEOLEIAN G.A., HAYES K.F., SKERLOS S.J., 2008, Comparison of Life Cycle Emissions and Energy Consumption for Environmentally Adapted Metalworking Fluid Systems, Environmental Science & Technology, 42/22, 8534–8540.
43.
ALSWAT H.M., MATIVENGA P.T., 2022, Modelling the Direct and Embodied Energy Requirements of Machining, Journal of Cleaner Production, 366/132767.
44.
JENSEN M., 2016, Climate Impact from Metalworking Fluids, Wallenius Water Innovation, https://www. walleniuswater.com/process-fluids/blog/metalworking-fluids-impact-on-the-climate#:~:text=A%20metalworking %20fluid%20doesn't,use%20and%20in%20its%20container, (Accessed on: 13 Mar 2023).
45.
PUSAVEC F., KRAJNIK P., KOPAC J., 2010, Transitioning to Sustainable Production–Part I: Application on Machining Technologies, Journal of Cleaner production, 18/2, 174–184.
46.
GINTING Y.R., BOSWELL B., BISWAS W., ISLAM N., 2015, Advancing Environmentally Conscious Machining, Procedia CIRP, 26, 391–396.
47.
CARBON CLOUD, 2023, Rapeseed oil GB, Carbon Cloud, https://apps.carboncloud.com/c..., (Accessed on: 23/03/23).
48.
RUSTANDI F., WU H., 2010, Biodiesel Production from Canola in Western Australia: Energy and Carbon Footprints and Land, Water, and Labour Requirements, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49/22, 11785–11796.
49.
JI C., ZHAI Y., ZHANG T., SHEN X., BAI Y., HONG J., 2021, Carbon, Energy and Water Footprints Analysis of Rapeseed Oil Production: A Case Study in China, Journal of Environmental Management, 287/112359.
50.
BOBBA S., DEORSOLA F.A., BLENGINI G.A., FINO D., 2016, LCA of Tungsten Disulphide (WS2) Nano-Particles Synthesis: State of Art and from-Cradle-to-Gate LCA, Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1478–1484.
51.
GU J., WANG Z., KUEN J., MA L., SHAHROUDY A., SHUAI B., LIU T., WANG X., WANG G., CAI J., CHEN T., 2018, Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networks, Pattern Recognition, 77, 354–377.
52.
KRIZHEVSKY A., SUTSKEVER I., HINTON G.E., 2017, Imagenet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Communications of the ACM, 60/6, 84–90.
53.
GRZESIK W., 2017, Chapter Eight – Cutting Vibrations, in Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials (Second Edition), W. Grzesik, Editor., Elsevier. 147–162.
54.
STAVROPOULOS P., SOUFLAS T., PAPAIOANNOU C., BIKAS H., MOURTZIS D., 2023, An Adaptive, Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatter Detection Method for Milling Operations, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 124/7, 2037–2058.
55.
DOGAN H., SHOKRANI A., 2023, Investigation of Chatter Detection with Sensor-Integrated Tool Holders Based on Strain Measurement, Procedia CIRP, 117, 157–162.
56.
MOURTZIS D., ANGELOPOULOS J., PANOPOULOS N., 2022, A Literature Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0, Energies, 15/17, 6276.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2391-8071 |
| ISSN: | 1895-7595 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
